Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 3FE323800009B; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 09:03:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TTBSU-0001KZ-8E for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:02:18 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TTBST-0001KQ-HU for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:02:17 +0000 Received: from out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.237]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TTBSP-0007Wj-Cy for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:02:16 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsEBANXOj1ACZMOe/2dsb2JhbAANN4JKiS26ZAEBAQEDLRw8BAsJCAMBAQEBCRYBAQYHCQMCAQIBNAkIEwYCAQGxJYMpkDSLdYZdA5V0kzE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,679,1344207600"; d="scan'208,217";a="408389313" Received: from host-2-100-195-158.as13285.net (HELO [192.168.2.3]) ([2.100.195.158]) by out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 30 Oct 2012 13:02:10 +0000 Message-ID: <508FCFE6.2000202@psk31.plus.com> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:02:30 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <508E7A4B.4060807@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4783676F-DEBC-4E32-A3C8-3E786DDA704D@gmail.com> <508E93C4.9020606@psk31.plus.com> <508E9B54.30500@psk31.plus.com> <00bc01cdb5fa$cfe75c30$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <508EC0E7.5000009@psk31.plus.com> <00d901cdb685$cf09bd40$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: My sentiments entirely Terry although this one is straining the patience. Now using 02r2702, I understand Stefan's pink waterfall. Previous versions have excessive audio levels, RX and TX. Ver 02r2702 is overloading and I can't get reliable local copy on my XP Sammy Netbook which handles all other software fine. Also Phanom repeat signals in the next minute slot after receiving a signal from PA0O are rife, can't tell he he is sending for one minute or two or 3 or 4. I think you may see WSPR from here again very soon today.:-( [...] Content analysis details: (0.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.3 HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD BODY: HTML font face is not a word X-Scan-Signature: 6f428181aa0b0a8218d006193d76774c Subject: Re: LF: JT9 what is the qso mode exactly ? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070406080804090705010101" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN,HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408e508fd03118b7 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070406080804090705010101 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit My sentiments entirely Terry although this one is straining the patience. Now using 02r2702, I understand Stefan's pink waterfall. Previous versions have excessive audio levels, RX and TX. Ver 02r2702 is overloading and I can't get reliable local copy on my XP Sammy Netbook which handles all other software fine. Also Phanom repeat signals in the next minute slot after receiving a signal from PA0O are rife, can't tell he he is sending for one minute or two or 3 or 4. I think you may see WSPR from here again very soon today.:-( Eddie On 30/10/2012 10:47, Terry GW0EZY wrote: > > Yes but its good fun Mal -- I'm enjoying it -- some new "appliance" to > play with and see developing from the start -- always gets me > interested. If ham radio was just bashing a key to collect quick DX > QSOs on HF I'd take up stamp collecting! > > 73 Terry > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:*owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] *On Behalf Of *mal hamilton > *Sent:* 30 October 2012 10:03 > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Subject:* Re: LF: JT9 what is the qso mode exactly ? > > I cannot stop laughing !!! It beats Hancock the radio ham. > > Nearly 100 emails this morning about something that a simple CW QSO > would solve in a few seconds > > Still not resolved----------- Ghost images, Part decodes, Computer > crashes and so it goes on. > > Watch this space Hancock Part 2 > > ----- Original Message ----- > > *From:*g3zjo > > *To:*rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > > *Sent:*Monday, October 29, 2012 5:46 PM > > *Subject:*Re: LF: JT9 what is the qso mode exactly ? > > Did you smile though Mal, go on I a dare you, it doesn't hurt honest. > > > On 29/10/2012 17:28, mal hamilton wrote: > > OR something useful like > > I do not have an antenna and need JT9 the Miracle mode to get > beyond my yard Gate > > ----- Original Message ----- > > *From:*g3zjo > > *To:*rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > > *Sent:*Monday, October 29, 2012 3:05 PM > > *Subject:*Re: LF: JT9 what is the qso mode exactly ? > > And you could send the longest place name in the world, which > starts something like this :- > > *1440 10 -13 0.2 1402.44 0.00 LLANFYR > * > But you have to split it up a bit, and ends like this :- > > *1442 10 -13 0.2 1401.79 0.00 OGOGOG > * > Eddie > > On 29/10/2012 14:33, g3zjo wrote: > >> Yes Roger you can. >> >> Send that :- >> >> *1424 10 -14 0.2 1402.60 0.00 BRILLIANT >> * >> >> On 29/10/2012 13:46, Roger Lapthorn wrote: >> >>> Brilliant!! >>> >>> On 29 Oct 2012, at 12:44, Stefan Schäfer wrote: >>> >>>> LF, >>>> >>>> Am 29.10.2012 00:50, schrieb Graham: >>>>> JT9 what is the qso mode exactly ? >>>>> >>>>> Is the qso mode a set of fixed responses as in the eme variants >>>>> >>>>> or could one type 'I have a cat' for example ? >>>>> >>>>> G.. >>>> I got this report from RN3AGC: >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 29.10.2012 06:59, schrieb rn3agc: >>>>> JT9-2: >>>>> 0038 7 -24 0.4 1430.98 0.00 I HAVE A CAT 0054 5 -25 0.4 1430.82 0.00 I HAVE A CAT >>>>> :)) >>>> Seems to work :-) >>>> >>>> 73, Stefan >>> ----- >>> No virus found in this message. >>> Checked by AVG -www.avg.com >>> Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5360 - Release Date: 10/28/12 >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> No virus found in this message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5360 - Release >> Date: 10/28/12 >> > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5360 - Release Date: > 10/28/12 > > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5362 - Release Date: 10/29/12 > --------------070406080804090705010101 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit My sentiments entirely Terry although this one is straining the patience.
Now using 02r2702, I understand Stefan's pink waterfall. Previous versions have excessive audio levels, RX and TX. Ver 02r2702 is overloading and I can't get reliable local copy on my XP Sammy Netbook which handles all other software fine. Also Phanom repeat signals in the next minute slot after receiving a signal  from PA0O are rife, can't tell he he is sending for one minute or two or 3 or 4.
I think you may see WSPR from here again very soon today. :-(

Eddie
 

On 30/10/2012 10:47, Terry GW0EZY wrote:

Yes but its good fun Mal – I’m enjoying it – some new “appliance” to play with and see developing from the start – always gets me interested. If ham radio was just bashing a key to collect quick DX QSOs on HF I’d take up stamp collecting!

 

73 Terry

 


From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of mal hamilton
Sent: 30 October 2012 10:03
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: JT9 what is the qso mode exactly ?

 

I cannot stop laughing !!! It beats Hancock the radio ham.

Nearly 100 emails this morning about something that a simple CW QSO would solve in a few seconds

Still not resolved----------- Ghost images, Part decodes, Computer crashes and so it goes on.

Watch this space Hancock Part 2

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: g3zjo

Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 5:46 PM

Subject: Re: LF: JT9 what is the qso mode exactly ?

 

Did you smile though Mal, go on I a dare you, it doesn't hurt honest.


On 29/10/2012 17:28, mal hamilton wrote:

OR        something useful like

 

I do not have an antenna and need JT9 the Miracle mode to get beyond my yard Gate

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: g3zjo

Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 3:05 PM

Subject: Re: LF: JT9 what is the qso mode exactly ?

 

And you could send the longest place name in the world, which starts something like this :-

1440  10  -13   0.2 1402.44  0.00   LLANFYR

But you have to split it up a bit, and ends like this :-
             
1442  10  -13   0.2 1401.79  0.00   OGOGOG  

Eddie

On 29/10/2012 14:33, g3zjo wrote:

Yes Roger you can.

Send that :-

1424  10  -14   0.2 1402.60  0.00   BRILLIANT


On 29/10/2012 13:46, Roger Lapthorn wrote:

Brilliant!!
 
On 29 Oct 2012, at 12:44, Stefan Schäfer <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote:
 
LF, 
 
Am 29.10.2012 00:50, schrieb Graham:
JT9  what is  the  qso mode  exactly ?
 
Is the  qso  mode   a  set  of  fixed   responses    as in the  eme  variants  
 
or  could  one type  'I have a cat'  for  example  ?
 
G..
I got this report from RN3AGC:
 
 
Am 29.10.2012 06:59, schrieb rn3agc: 
JT9-2: 
0038   7  -24   0.4 1430.98  0.00   I HAVE A CAT          0054   5  -25   0.4 1430.82  0.00   I HAVE A CAT 
:))
Seems to work :-)
 
73, Stefan
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5360 - Release Date: 10/28/12
 
 
 



No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5360 - Release Date: 10/28/12

 

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5360 - Release Date: 10/28/12

 

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5362 - Release Date: 10/29/12


--------------070406080804090705010101--