Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 67D063800008B; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 20:46:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TSzy3-0006SU-NK for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 00:46:07 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TSzy3-0006SL-8D for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 00:46:07 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TSzy1-0004oV-Fj for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 00:46:06 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q9U0k49u022029 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 01:46:04 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q9U0k4JA020207 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 01:46:04 +0100 Message-ID: <508F2345.7000509@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 01:45:57 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <01c801cdb62a$c0069170$4013b450$@simnet.is> <508F1276.4030809@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <8355E3A30B074B1F90A088E8DBFF9182@intelp4> <508F1AA4.4070102@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <05E40CB4FD92465892D30A11C9EB81FD@White> In-Reply-To: <05E40CB4FD92465892D30A11C9EB81FD@White> X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks Markus, Unbelivable: I got my first decode in JT9! https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/JT9-5.png DX distance is 20m!! :-) It was received on a Win7 PC. I used my /p LF receiver which uses the same concept as the grabber RX, a 125 kHz LO, fixed. So i also had to use the same software, i.e. SL to shift the frequency (-11300 Hz), then VAC and then JT9-5. [...] Content analysis details: (-1.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: e4d79cc1e5beb0f7c63f6aa3ce129e10 Subject: Re: LF: DK7FC JT9-5 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050608030005050907050804" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4081508f2375141b X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050608030005050907050804 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thanks Markus, Unbelivable: I got my first decode in JT9! https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/JT9-5.png DX distance is 20m!! :-) It was received on a Win7 PC. I used my /p LF receiver which uses the same concept as the grabber RX, a 125 kHz LO, fixed. So i also had to use the same software, i.e. SL to shift the frequency (-11300 Hz), then VAC and then JT9-5. So obviously it has either to do with the software that is used and/or the CPU performance. On my other PC, there are 6 SL instances running 24/365, also JT9 and VAC. Sometimes the CPU load is 100%. Maybe this causes the non-decodes. But it was no problem for WSPR! 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 30.10.2012 01:29, schrieb Markus Vester: > Getting somewhat more regular JT9-5 decodes now from Stefan, and also > saw DF2JP. I did switch off the built-in noiseblanker before 23:50. > This seemed to further devastate the displayed SNR values, but perhaps > improved signal integrity for the decodes? > 2340 10 -9 0.0 1939.84 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK > 2345 10 -23 0.2 1939.84 0.00 > 2350 10 -26 0.2 1939.84 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK > 0000 10 -26 0.2 1939.84 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK > 0010 10 -27 0.0 1939.84 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK > 0015 3 -30 0.0 1956.90 0.00 DF2JP JO31JG > 0020 10 -9 0.0 1939.88 0.00 > 73 & good luck, > Markus (DF6NM) --------------050608030005050907050804 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thanks Markus,

Unbelivable: I got my first decode in JT9! https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/JT9-5.png  DX distance is 20m!! :-)

It was received on a Win7 PC. I used my /p LF receiver which uses the same concept as the grabber RX, a 125 kHz LO, fixed. So i also had to use the same software, i.e. SL to shift the frequency (-11300 Hz), then VAC and then JT9-5.

So obviously it has either to do with the software that is used and/or the CPU performance. On my other PC, there are 6 SL instances running 24/365, also JT9 and VAC. Sometimes the CPU load is 100%. Maybe this causes the non-decodes. But it was no problem for WSPR!

73, Stefan/DK7FC






Am 30.10.2012 01:29, schrieb Markus Vester:
Getting somewhat more regular JT9-5 decodes now from Stefan, and also saw DF2JP. I did switch off the built-in noiseblanker before 23:50. This seemed to further devastate the displayed SNR values, but perhaps improved signal integrity for the decodes?
 
2340  10   -9   0.0 1939.84  0.00    DK7FC JN49IK        
2345  10  -23   0.2 1939.84  0.00
2350  10  -26   0.2 1939.84  0.00    DK7FC JN49IK        
0000  10  -26   0.2 1939.84  0.00    DK7FC JN49IK        
0010  10  -27   0.0 1939.84  0.00    DK7FC JN49IK        
0015   3  -30   0.0 1956.90  0.00   DF2JP JO31JG        
0020  10   -9   0.0 1939.88  0.00
 
73 & good luck,
Markus (DF6NM)
--------------050608030005050907050804--