Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 0375E380000BD; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 20:10:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TSzOQ-0005c2-Ck for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 00:09:18 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TSzOP-0005bs-RL for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 00:09:17 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TSzOO-0004Vq-AL for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 00:09:16 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q9U09FeA012327 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 01:09:15 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q9U09FjG019510 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 01:09:15 +0100 Message-ID: <508F1AA4.4070102@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 01:09:08 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <01c801cdb62a$c0069170$4013b450$@simnet.is> <508F1276.4030809@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <8355E3A30B074B1F90A088E8DBFF9182@intelp4> In-Reply-To: <8355E3A30B074B1F90A088E8DBFF9182@intelp4> X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks Terry, Am 30.10.2012 01:00, schrieb Terry GW0EZY: > Rx now tuned to 136.3 and decode OK: > > 2350 10 1 0.7 1138.33 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK > > > Strange to have this frequency offset when changing from JT9-2 to JT9-5 > > It took over 2 minutes to decode (Win7-32 2.84 GHz 4-core) > > 73 GW0EZY > [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 2e2f7cbbe9f38dd7bf3fac4fc012e6fc Subject: Re: LF: DK7FC JT9-5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40c9508f1adc24be X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Thanks Terry, Am 30.10.2012 01:00, schrieb Terry GW0EZY: > Rx now tuned to 136.3 and decode OK: > > 2350 10 1 0.7 1138.33 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK > > > Strange to have this frequency offset when changing from JT9-2 to JT9-5 > > It took over 2 minutes to decode (Win7-32 2.84 GHz 4-core) > > 73 GW0EZY > Try to reduce the range from +-50 Hz to say +- 10 Hz. This will reduce the decode time a lot! Would be interesting what the difference is on your side. I will leave this transmission running over the night in case someone in the US or Canada or where ever wants to go on testing. Or should i switch to JT9-10 now? Somewhere there across the pond? 73, Stefan