Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mj01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id EF3F3380000A4; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 14:15:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TStdi-0006GR-7x for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 18:00:42 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TStdh-0006GI-OF for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 18:00:41 +0000 Received: from mout1.freenet.de ([195.4.92.91]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (UNKNOWN:AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TStdg-0001LF-3k for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 18:00:40 +0000 Received: from [195.4.92.142] (helo=mjail2.freenet.de) by mout1.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1TStde-0006Ne-V7 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:00:38 +0100 Received: from localhost ([::1]:49611 helo=mjail2.freenet.de) by mjail2.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1TStde-0002Dy-PY for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:00:38 +0100 Received: from [195.4.92.23] (port=57270 helo=13.mx.freenet.de) by mjail2.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1TStbE-0000vI-65 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 18:58:08 +0100 Received: from blfd-4db00c1a.pool.mediaways.net ([77.176.12.26]:2023 helo=[192.168.178.22]) by 13.mx.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (port 465) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1TStbD-0003Wj-Rd for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 18:58:08 +0100 Message-ID: <508EC3AF.7060707@freenet.de> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 18:58:07 +0100 From: wolf_dl4yhf User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <008001cdb5b7$51a73e50$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <1351511547.92830.YahooMailNeo@web133206.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1351511547.92830.YahooMailNeo@web133206.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Pete, Mmmh, let's keep fingers crossed so this 'burst' of activity doesn't turn into a supernova, very bright initially, but rapidly decaying afterwards... 73 and hope to catch you soon, [...] Content analysis details: (-0.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [195.4.92.91 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dl4yhf[at]freenet.de) -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: fb3e28a759dea7e01d34d3fe7de7ae98 Subject: Re: LF: 500 clutter Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060502090008060704000502" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d7b95508ec7b07674 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060502090008060704000502 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Pete, Mmmh, let's keep fingers crossed so this 'burst' of activity doesn't turn into a supernova, very bright initially, but rapidly decaying afterwards... 73 and hope to catch you soon, Wolf DL4YHF / DF0WD on MF Am 29.10.2012 12:52, schrieb M0FMT: > Hi Mal > 630m band is much much more active than 600m at the moment at least. > All DLs of course, there hasn't been a night over the last couple of > weeks when I have not heard a CW Call or QSO on or around 472.5. It > may be like 600m at the start then die out. The NDBs give a very good > indication of band conditions. Some of these stations are only 25Watts > and I am hearing stuff 400 to a 1000 miles out every night, but > getting the operating conditions for most is difficult, too bad it's > not published. > 73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX --------------060502090008060704000502 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi Pete,

Mmmh, let's keep fingers crossed so this 'burst' of activity doesn't turn into a supernova, very bright initially, but rapidly decaying afterwards...

73 and hope to catch you soon,

  Wolf DL4YHF / DF0WD on MF

Am 29.10.2012 12:52, schrieb M0FMT:
Hi Mal
 
630m band is much much more active than 600m at the moment at least. All DLs of course, there hasn't been a night over the last couple of weeks when I have not heard a CW Call or QSO on or around 472.5. It may be like 600m at the start then die out. The NDBs give a very good indication of band conditions. Some of these stations are only 25Watts and I am hearing stuff 400 to a 1000 miles out every night, but getting the operating conditions for most is difficult, too bad it's not published.
 
73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX

--------------060502090008060704000502--