Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mg03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 83C4E3800009E; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 19:11:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TSbzt-0001Vl-4v for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 23:10:25 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TSbzs-0001VX-Me for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 23:10:24 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TSbzr-0004Km-3E for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 23:10:23 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q9SNALIc016416 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 00:10:22 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q9SNALEl013795 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 00:10:21 +0100 Message-ID: <508DBB57.8050408@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 00:10:15 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <508D47B2.8060209@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <46A9A1D9FC954A658216B197782524BF@White> <891CD59233F844C283BAC09A2AAA04BA@White> <508D6A9D.4020600@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <508D6C1A.7050607@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <508D8084.6020501@freenet.de> In-Reply-To: <508D8084.6020501@freenet.de> X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thank you Wolf! Probably it is a good idea to QSY to JT9-10 for the night. Is someone in the US ready to go on 137.43 kHz? Waiting for reply before i QSY. 73, Stefan/DK7FC [...] Content analysis details: (-1.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 1e15d6d6179985f133b43d42d658878a Subject: LF: JT9-10 for TA distances on LF? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090909030203080300040405" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60cb508dbb9a4412 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090909030203080300040405 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thank you Wolf! Probably it is a good idea to QSY to JT9-10 for the night. Is someone in the US ready to go on 137.43 kHz? Waiting for reply before i QSY. 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 28.10.2012 19:59, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf: > Still many more decodes from DK7FC, even though stronger, than from DF2JP. > I don't think Stefan's timing is the cause.. see this spectrogram with > lower frequency-, but larger time resolution: > > > > From that over, only 'CQ DF2JP JO31' was decoded. > I have saved wave files from a couple of overs, all with basically the > same decoding result. > > 73, Wolf DL4YHF . > --------------090909030203080300040405 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id q9SNALIc016416 Thank you Wolf!

Probably it is a good idea to QSY to JT9-10 for the night. Is someone in the US ready to go on 137.43 kHz? Waiting for reply before i QSY.

73, Stefan/DK7FC



Am 28.10.2012 19:59, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf:
Still many more decodes from DK7FC, even though stronger, than from DF2JP.
I don't think Stefan's timing is the cause.. see this spectrogram with lower frequency-, but larger time resolution:



>From that over, only 'CQ DF2JP JO31' was decoded.
I have saved wave files from a couple of overs, all with basically the same decoding result.

73, Wolf=A0 DL4YHF .

--------------090909030203080300040405--