Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dg01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 0917B380000B6; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 15:09:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TSYDq-0007R0-5s for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 19:08:34 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TSYDp-0007Qr-Nc for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 19:08:33 +0000 Received: from mout0.freenet.de ([195.4.92.90]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (UNKNOWN:AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TSYDo-0002mh-8a for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 19:08:32 +0000 Received: from [195.4.92.140] (helo=mjail0.freenet.de) by mout0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1TSYDn-00049B-MR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 20:08:31 +0100 Received: from localhost ([::1]:58160 helo=mjail0.freenet.de) by mjail0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1TSYDn-00074H-IP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 20:08:31 +0100 Received: from [195.4.92.12] (port=58972 helo=2.mx.freenet.de) by mjail0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1TSYBi-0006JN-I5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 20:06:22 +0100 Received: from blfd-4d088a3f.pool.mediaways.net ([77.8.138.63]:1591 helo=[192.168.178.22]) by 2.mx.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (port 465) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1TSYBi-0003IV-3w for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 20:06:22 +0100 Message-ID: <508D822D.9010804@freenet.de> Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 20:06:21 +0100 From: wolf_dl4yhf User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <508D47B2.8060209@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <46A9A1D9FC954A658216B197782524BF@White> <891CD59233F844C283BAC09A2AAA04BA@White> <508D6A9D.4020600@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <508D6C1A.7050607@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <508D8084.6020501@freenet.de> In-Reply-To: <508D8084.6020501@freenet.de> X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Am 28.10.2012 19:59, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf: > Still many more decodes from DK7FC, even though stronger, than from DF2JP. Excuses, that should have read: ... less decodes from DK7FC, even through stronger than DF2JP.. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [195.4.92.90 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dl4yhf[at]freenet.de) -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: ac0f6ff1af52b6036ac1f4fe0c2bd52c Subject: Re: LF: no decodes, help needed Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020906040008080104040200" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4109508d82d8285c X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020906040008080104040200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Am 28.10.2012 19:59, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf: > Still many more decodes from DK7FC, even though stronger, than from DF2JP. Excuses, that should have read: ... less decodes from DK7FC, even through stronger than DF2JP.. Actually, now each of DF2JP's overs is decoded, but (almost) none from Stefan even though his signal is still stronger in JO42 . > 73, Wolf DL4YHF . > --------------020906040008080104040200 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Am 28.10.2012 19:59, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf:
Still many more decodes from DK7FC, even though stronger, than from DF2JP.

Excuses, that should have read:
... less decodes from DK7FC, even through stronger than DF2JP..

Actually, now each of DF2JP's overs is decoded, but (almost) none from Stefan even though his signal is still stronger in JO42 .


73, Wolf  DL4YHF .


--------------020906040008080104040200--