Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-df04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id E3FC938000108; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 13:07:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TSWK5-0005ae-Tv for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 17:06:53 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TSWK5-0005aV-9G for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 17:06:53 +0000 Received: from out1.ip03ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.239]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TSWK3-0001ye-62 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 17:06:52 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArMBACpljVBOlntn/2dsb2JhbAANNot3ug8BAQEBA0lACwQFCwQJFg8JAwIBAgFFEwgBAYd5FKd7hSCNPYt1gzmDJAOVdJMx X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,667,1344207600"; d="scan'208,217";a="403043101" Received: from host-78-150-123-103.as13285.net (HELO [192.168.2.2]) ([78.150.123.103]) by out1.ip03ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 28 Oct 2012 17:06:50 +0000 Message-ID: <508D662A.4050407@psk31.plus.com> Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 17:06:50 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <508D47B2.8060209@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <46A9A1D9FC954A658216B197782524BF@White> In-Reply-To: <46A9A1D9FC954A658216B197782524BF@White> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I was getting the echo on one instance of wsjtx this morning every time on local test, when I stopped TX'ing the signal seemed to be repeated on the RX set up in the next RX period. Spooks!! Eddie On 28/10/2012 16:52, Markus Vester wrote: > I'm receiving a strong JT9-1 signal on even minutes which must be from > DK7FC, but like with PA0A I'm getting no decodes. Strange thing is > that though the signal was clearly absent at odd minute slots, WSJT-X > seemed to produce an echo. This appeared on the waterfall and sync > aquisition, but of course won't decode either. > https://dl.dropbox.com/u/26404526/jt9-1_dk7fc_echo.png > https://dl.dropbox.com/u/26404526/jt9-1_dk7fc_echo_waterfall.jpg > This effect seems to be peculiar to JT9-1, and does not happen at > JT9-2, which appears to decode nicely: > 1646 10 -14 0.4 1930.52 0.00 CQ DK7FC JN49 > Best 73, > Markus (DF6NM) > > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5358 - Release Date: 10/27/12 > [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 69d86b33142413363dd56bd312139bf4 Subject: Re: LF: no decodes, help needed Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010309050304020906020204" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40d8508d66642e22 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010309050304020906020204 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I was getting the echo on one instance of wsjtx this morning every time on local test, when I stopped TX'ing the signal seemed to be repeated on the RX set up in the next RX period. Spooks!! Eddie On 28/10/2012 16:52, Markus Vester wrote: > I'm receiving a strong JT9-1 signal on even minutes which must be from > DK7FC, but like with PA0A I'm getting no decodes. Strange thing is > that though the signal was clearly absent at odd minute slots, WSJT-X > seemed to produce an echo. This appeared on the waterfall and sync > aquisition, but of course won't decode either. > https://dl.dropbox.com/u/26404526/jt9-1_dk7fc_echo.png > https://dl.dropbox.com/u/26404526/jt9-1_dk7fc_echo_waterfall.jpg > This effect seems to be peculiar to JT9-1, and does not happen at > JT9-2, which appears to decode nicely: > 1646 10 -14 0.4 1930.52 0.00 CQ DK7FC JN49 > Best 73, > Markus (DF6NM) > > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5358 - Release Date: 10/27/12 > --------------010309050304020906020204 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
I was getting the echo on one instance of wsjtx this morning every time on local test, when I stopped  TX'ing the signal seemed to be repeated on the RX set up in the next RX period. Spooks!!

Eddie

On 28/10/2012 16:52, Markus Vester wrote:
I'm receiving a strong JT9-1 signal on even minutes which must be from DK7FC, but like with PA0A I'm getting no decodes. Strange thing is that though the signal was clearly absent at odd minute slots, WSJT-X seemed to produce an echo. This appeared on the waterfall and sync aquisition, but of course won't decode either.
 
This effect seems to be peculiar to JT9-1, and does not happen at JT9-2, which appears to decode nicely:
 
1646 10 -14 0.4 1930.52 0.00 CQ DK7FC JN49
 
Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)
 

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5358 - Release Date: 10/27/12


--------------010309050304020906020204--