Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mh02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 9DE9C38000085; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 10:57:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TSUIO-0002xE-5M for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 14:57:00 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TSUIN-0002x5-PG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 14:56:59 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TSUIM-0000xm-0m for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 14:56:58 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q9SEuunB005524 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 15:56:56 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q9SEuuOp004224 for ; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 15:56:56 +0100 Message-ID: <508D47B2.8060209@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 15:56:50 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: LF, I'm now receiving in JT9-1 on 137.43 kHz. I can see a strong JT9-2 signal but there is no decode. The signal appears in the programs waterfal display. Timing is accurate. The SNR must be at least 15 dB above the decode level. [...] Content analysis details: (-1.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 4d4a9e8f68fb15c54898568240f542c5 Subject: LF: no decodes, help needed Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60d6508d47ed19b7 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none LF, I'm now receiving in JT9-1 on 137.43 kHz. I can see a strong JT9-2 signal but there is no decode. The signal appears in the programs waterfal display. Timing is accurate. The SNR must be at least 15 dB above the decode level. See this capture https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/JT9.png Has someone an idea? 73, Stefan/DK7FC