Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mp05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 7445238000090; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 10:05:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TSTU4-0002PU-1I for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 14:05:00 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TSTU3-0002PL-GO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 14:04:59 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TSTU2-0000fO-12 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 14:04:58 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q9SE4vjq028055 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 15:04:57 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q9SE4vns003101 for ; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 15:04:57 +0100 Message-ID: <508D3B83.2040500@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 15:04:51 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <508D2FFF.40700@princeton.edu> <508D3344.9050200@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <005901cdb513$6a2750e0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> In-Reply-To: <005901cdb513$6a2750e0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: OK Mal, Are you ready for a QSO? I'm already receiving in JT9-1 on 137.43 +-0.05 kHz! 73, Stefan [...] Content analysis details: (-1.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 1f795a2ee1ecd56682b47ad11969b3d3 Subject: Re: LF: Answers to some JT9 questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1dc149508d3bbc16e7 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none OK Mal, Are you ready for a QSO? I'm already receiving in JT9-1 on 137.43 +-0.05 kHz! 73, Stefan Am 28.10.2012 14:52, schrieb mal hamilton: > Stefan > Why is a mapping feature necessary when you can have a real time QSO and get > a direct report like most operators do on HF > What you are suggesting is a BEACON mode again and QSL via INTERNET. The > intention is a QSO mode and get away from Beacon mentality. > > > de g3kev >