Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dg01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id F29E938000083; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 03:20:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TSN9U-0007a5-Cq for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 07:19:20 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TSN9T-0007Zw-UO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 07:19:19 +0000 Received: from eterpe-smout.broadpark.no ([80.202.8.16]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TSN9R-0006hq-M8 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 07:19:18 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Received: from ignis-smin.broadpark.no ([80.202.8.11]) by eterpe-smout.broadpark.no (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u3-15.01 64bit (built Feb 12 2010)) with ESMTP id <0MCL00MCZDO47S10@eterpe-smout.broadpark.no> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 08:19:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([178.232.28.235]) by ignis-smin.broadpark.no (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u3-15.01 64bit (built Feb 12 2010)) with ESMTPA id <0MCL00HJ7DNWHSC0@ignis-smin.broadpark.no> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 08:19:16 +0100 (CET) Message-id: <508CDC6B.8040805@broadpark.no> Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 08:19:07 +0100 From: Steinar Aanesland User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1 To: rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk, "*rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Cc: Joe References: In-reply-to: X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Joe, first a big thanks to you for your great work for the ham community. The PTT seems to function nice with the latest update. la5vna Steinar [...] Content analysis details: (-1.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [80.202.8.16 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 8556389a5ea14fbbf9b9d801ab70c592 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: LF: JT9: A New Digital Mode for MF and LF X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4109508cdcac7ecf X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Joe, first a big thanks to you for your great work for the ham community. The PTT seems to function nice with the latest update. la5vna Steinar Den 28.10.2012 02:50, skrev Joe: > Many thanks for all the early feedback on WSJT-X, both on- and off-list. > > A number of users have reported that PTT is not being properly released when as transmission is finished. I have not yet found a computer that exhibits this problem... and needless to say, it did not arise for any of us who made the first on-the-air tests. For this reason, running this bug down has not been easy. > > If you have experienced this problem, please try replacing the wsjtx.exe that you got with the download with one I have posted at > http://www.physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/wsjtx.exe > > Depending on the nature of the problem, this one might issue an error message when it fails to turn off the PTT successfully. Or it might solve your problem, as it did for W7IUV. > > One important note went out to the first testers, but was not in my more open announcement. This early program version may not properly re-initialize all parameters when you change between JT9 submodes. To be sure, it's probably best to restart the program after changing modes. This will be fixed soon! > > I see that despite these early teething problems, a number of QSOs are being made tonight with JT9. I look forward to hearing summaries of your experiences! > > -- 73, Joe, K1JT > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: > http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/rsgb_lf_group/ > > <*> Your email settings: > Individual Email | Traditional > > <*> To change settings online go to: > http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/rsgb_lf_group/join > (Yahoo! ID required) > > <*> To change settings via email: > rsgb_lf_group-digest@yahoogroups.co.uk > rsgb_lf_group-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.co.uk > > <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > rsgb_lf_group-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.co.uk > > <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: > http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/info/terms.html > > > -- LA5VNA Steinar loc:jo59jq www.opera.no