Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mi06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 8887238000081; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 16:28:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TSCzQ-00039d-8q for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 21:28:16 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TSCzP-00039H-Ed for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 21:28:15 +0100 Received: from eterpe-smout.broadpark.no ([80.202.8.16]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TSCzN-0003S4-Au for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 21:28:14 +0100 Received: from ignis-smin.broadpark.no ([80.202.8.11]) by eterpe-smout.broadpark.no (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u3-15.01 64bit (built Feb 12 2010)) with ESMTP id <0MCK00JWYJJ0OCA0@eterpe-smout.broadpark.no> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 22:28:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([178.232.28.235]) by ignis-smin.broadpark.no (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u3-15.01 64bit (built Feb 12 2010)) with ESMTPA id <0MCK0086KJIYPP10@ignis-smin.broadpark.no> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 22:28:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 22:28:09 +0200 From: Steinar Aanesland In-reply-to: <508C3D68.6020809@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-id: <508C43D9.50008@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 References: <508C2AC9.3010109@broadpark.no> <508C3D68.6020809@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1 X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan, have you had the opportunity to test jt9? Are you QRV on 600m? I can't RX on to 2200m today. -- LA5VNA Steinar loc:jo59jq www.opera.no Den 27.10.2012 22:00, skrev Stefan Schäfer: > Oh, now Joe has lifted the secret ;-) > He released the mode 2 days ago and a first update yesterday. > > Now it really gets complex which mode to choose. WSPR, Opera, JT9... > But as a digital mode for LF i gues JT9-30 is the most promising at all. > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > > [...] Content analysis details: (-1.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [80.202.8.16 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 7001055fa59a9c23b9831ea6d317a074 Subject: Re: LF: JT9: A New Digital Mode for MF and LF Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d7b8e508c440507a5 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Stefan, have you had the opportunity to test jt9? Are you QRV on 600m? I can't RX on to 2200m today. --=20 LA5VNA Steinar loc:jo59jq www.opera.no Den 27.10.2012 22:00, skrev Stefan Sch=E4fer: > Oh, now Joe has lifted the secret ;-) > He released the mode 2 days ago and a first update yesterday. > > Now it really gets complex which mode to choose. WSPR, Opera, JT9..= . > But as a digital mode for LF i gues JT9-30 is the most promising at= all. > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > >