Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mk03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 820B93800008D; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 16:02:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TSCYx-0002ye-JJ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 21:00:55 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TSCYx-0002yV-21 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 21:00:55 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TSCYu-0003KA-UT for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 21:00:53 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q9RK0pgl024464 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 22:00:52 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q9RK0pxE009636 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 22:00:51 +0200 Message-ID: <508C3D68.6020809@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 22:00:40 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <508C2AC9.3010109@broadpark.no> In-Reply-To: <508C2AC9.3010109@broadpark.no> X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Oh, now Joe has lifted the secret ;-) He released the mode 2 days ago and a first update yesterday. Now it really gets complex which mode to choose. WSPR, Opera, JT9... But as a digital mode for LF i gues JT9-30 is the most promising at all. [...] Content analysis details: (-3.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 7b4dbd93955117b98f3a6ac4d7602f88 Subject: Re: LF: JT9: A New Digital Mode for MF and LF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d6187508c3db8242d X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Oh, now Joe has lifted the secret ;-) He released the mode 2 days ago and a first update yesterday. Now it really gets complex which mode to choose. WSPR, Opera, JT9... But as a digital mode for LF i gues JT9-30 is the most promising at all. 73, Stefan/DK7FC