Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mc01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 8427738000261; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:56:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TRRet-0007Sb-2S for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 18:55:55 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TRRes-0007SS-M3 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 18:55:54 +0100 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TRReq-0007cF-V6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 18:55:53 +0100 Received: from [192.168.2.104] (p4FD17760.dip.t-dialin.net [79.209.119.96]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap4) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0Lr20J-1Sx2n634J1-00e554; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:55:52 +0200 Message-ID: <50897D27.9090906@legal-medicine.de> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:55:51 +0200 From: pws User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120825 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:+iGBRi34pGwDR+LthkQmGB5VjcMzrN2BR6uoLV3mJOZ 9fXiadVUC1VMhwRRANKLWsShgwpvZAuPPtQVW+lIeaf9ajwCbn RrdETinTywifDlX7bnCDler8eEyRy7WkBqH0Y6rnezwHFxAbeo wCW3kUFvOfka4FfYmSWCdRtKlIwXXAxmQ9nB6fBNZUxNVRsH3n ZB5Yqekv+PnNwkY2J3PEw4GAAoIy5gTVIRtqWoMYCR2Wukm9Md 3UdgMs7tnfDls+W9n9z4unBLGW2ijnSH7REfKq0yucxEyq5Zci dQyDLebJH61K+J5MuLVDThZLDcv5VG8GzBOOGpVULzewB+C6Yq 9qefhEMH1BuzCPHTomq2qhdeRNKAitdZadnWWpf6Q X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, Confirmed! BPC is 40 dB above noise at 13 mHz of spectral resolution. 1 Hz sidebands are visible up to the 5th. (2012-10-25 17:30 utc) [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.227.126.186 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: 0a4643e586472c13187d293ec5d096c2 Subject: Re: LF: 68.5KHz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d604950897d6a019f X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi, Confirmed! BPC is 40 dB above noise at 13 mHz of spectral resolution. 1 Hz sidebands are visible up to the 5th. (2012-10-25 17:30 utc) Roelof wrote: > ... > On an other note, does anybody know if MSF on 60 kHz transmits a residual > carrier in the pauses between the dashes? > ... In contrast to DCF77 et WWVB, MSF has no residual carrier. > ... > I can see a weak signal there, but not continual. > So it might be JJY on 60 kHz. > ... May be a mix of JJY-60 and WWVB (long path)? Are you observing any 1 Hz sidebands in between? That would be a proof. Peter, df3lp