Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-da03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id DDB093800008B; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 18:17:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TQ3pX-0006uR-LR for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 23:17:11 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TQ3pX-0006uI-67 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 23:17:11 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TQ3pV-000630-5J for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 23:17:10 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q9LMH8x7005446 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 00:17:08 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q9LMH8WP019564 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 00:17:08 +0200 Message-ID: <50847459.6060905@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 00:16:57 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Laurence, Am 21.10.2012 20:51, schrieb Laurence KL1 X: > Well Its 1045am, 1845Z and Im seeing DCF39 at this time which tells me > its getting darker and colder out there! > > I run overnight on DFCW around 137.776 at 800W more to shake down the > array but appears nominal. I didnt see anything from any of the > snappers but I shouldn't be disappointed as LF up here in very fickle. [...] Content analysis details: (-3.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: b14bcaca65d4b584f77d02a84d381cb4 Subject: Re: LF: Darkness is coming Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070207070603080302040207" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d404b508474934840 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070207070603080302040207 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Laurence, Am 21.10.2012 20:51, schrieb Laurence KL1 X: > Well Its 1045am, 1845Z and Im seeing DCF39 at this time which tells me > its getting darker and colder out there! > > I run overnight on DFCW around 137.776 at 800W more to shake down the > array but appears nominal. I didnt see anything from any of the > snappers but I shouldn't be disappointed as LF up here in very fickle. That sounds good. I wish you good luck! The first winter i see you're active since i joined the group here in late 2009. What was your best DX so far? Would it be realistic to try to receive you from here? For me it's probably not realistic but there are some stations in the UK who yould give it a try. And what about TF3HZ or VE1VDM? > > For the moment the ground and lake is frozen but the wind has been > blowing hard for days. Im reloading Opera as on tx it kind of gives > out after about 10 secs with a warbly audio - Ill retest later but its > not a RF issue. > > Ah yes, for got to say that on comparing my large TX loop, 2T K9AY and > L400B probe on the North Pole path on receive- the L400B probe (up at > 60ft and near the lake) gives slightly better rx s/n results - its > less than a dB but hey Ill take it - and given the wave angle of the > loop(s) they was some variability - :-) Nice said! OK i will be transmitting DFCW-90 later. Oops, its already 0:16 AM local here :-/ 73, Stefan > > > > Laurence KL 1X > Wasilla Alaska --------------070207070603080302040207 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Laurence,

Am 21.10.2012 20:51, schrieb Laurence KL1 X:
Well Its 1045am, 1845Z and Im seeing DCF39 at this time which tells me its getting darker and colder out there!

 I run overnight on DFCW around 137.776 at 800W more to shake down the array but appears nominal. I didnt see anything from any of the snappers but I shouldn't be disappointed as LF up here in very fickle.

That sounds good. I wish you good luck! The first winter i see you're active since i joined the group here in late 2009.
What was your best DX so far? Would it be realistic to try to receive you from here? For me it's probably not realistic but there are some stations in the UK who yould give it a try. And what about TF3HZ or VE1VDM?


 For the moment the ground and lake is frozen but the wind has been blowing hard for days. Im reloading Opera as on tx it kind of gives out after about 10 secs with a warbly audio - Ill retest later but its not a RF issue.

Ah yes, for got to say that on comparing my large TX loop, 2T K9AY and L400B probe on the North Pole path  on receive- the L400B probe (up at 60ft and near the lake) gives slightly better rx s/n results - its less than a dB but hey Ill take it - and given the wave angle of the loop(s) they was some variability -
:-) Nice said!
OK i will be transmitting DFCW-90 later. Oops, its already 0:16 AM local here :-/

73, Stefan





Laurence KL 1X
Wasilla Alaska
--------------070207070603080302040207--