Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 54DBF38000164; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 18:33:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TOydu-0002U5-Ea for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 23:32:42 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TOydt-0002Tw-OC for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 23:32:41 +0100 Received: from mta31.charter.net ([216.33.127.82]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TOydr-0000rA-EZ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 23:32:40 +0100 Received: from imp09 ([10.20.200.9]) by mta31.charter.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.02 201-2260-151-103-20110920) with ESMTP id <20121018223234.ZFOG24708.mta31.charter.net@imp09> for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 18:32:34 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.10] ([24.183.155.104]) by imp09 with smtp.charter.net id CmYa1k00U2FR9qG05mYarx; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 18:32:34 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=nlrKf9u5uG3fs/vD0VBbL3/xzyN25p4t1WHsSeqasGo= c=1 sm=1 a=b2nRVtXOy8EA:10 a=yUnIBFQkZM0A:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=k9rhMujQtVdkIhoT5l68iA==:17 a=oCcaPWc0AAAA:8 a=XrjPeoayONLAuzh6tVEA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=k9rhMujQtVdkIhoT5l68iA==:117 Message-ID: <5080860B.4040006@charter.net> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 18:43:23 -0400 From: John Andrews User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Dimitrios, I believe that JA7NI typically uses that frequency. John, W1TAG [...] Content analysis details: (-0.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [216.33.127.82 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 5c1f37c04fc013ebbc2288fd3791d043 Subject: Re: LF: unknown trace Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408f508083cf6263 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Dimitrios, I believe that JA7NI typically uses that frequency. John, W1TAG On 10/18/2012 5:15 PM, Dimitrios Tsifakis wrote: > Hello group, > > I don't get to see many traces in my grabber so naturally I am quite > excited when this happens. Who will claim this partial DFCW trace that > appeared in my grabber this morning at sunrise? :-) > > 73, Dimitris VK1SV > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.5.455 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/5338 - Release Date: 10/17/12 19:26:00 >