Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-di05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 1EA1E3800008C; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 08:50:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TO6b1-00039g-L4 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:50:07 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TO6b1-00039X-81 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:50:07 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TO6az-0004pX-M6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:50:06 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q9GCo4Pv019750 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 14:50:05 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q9GCo4qD023851 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 14:50:04 +0200 Message-ID: <507D57F6.7090809@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 14:49:58 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <507D5247.5040100@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <3clq785amof88d6frrqe43vdhflt34h0p1@4ax.com> In-Reply-To: <3clq785amof88d6frrqe43vdhflt34h0p1@4ax.com> X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello George, Thank you. Please tell me, did you get more experience about the best transmit times from EU to your location? Is JA7NI still transmitting for you or was it just a short test? [...] Content analysis details: (-1.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 3b8620872b19e25fb6f4dfaf1256edc3 Subject: Re: LF: WSPR on LF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1da609507d582c5e2b X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello George, Thank you. Please tell me, did you get more experience about the best transmit times from EU to your location? Is JA7NI still transmitting for you or was it just a short test? I tried some time to appear on your grabber but there was no success so far. Maybe there was QRN or the times were not optimal. Do you have any suggestions? It's hard to evaluate this path without having a DCF-39 plot (knowing the NBW) or some first traces from here. BTW, it seems the EU-autumn season to VK is over now. But you are "just" in 2/3 of the distance and even in the northern hemisphere, so things may become a bit better.. 73, Stefan Am 16.10.2012 14:41, schrieb George Szymanski: > Hi Stefan, > > I have set one of my grabber screens to watch for you. > > 73 de George, DU1GM > > > > On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 14:25:43 +0200, you wrote: > > >> LF, >> >> I'm back from MF to LF and will run a WSPR (33%, normal, not slow) >> transmission on 137.45 kHz. Maybe some of the new receive stations that >> i saw on MF can be moved to LF by that :-) >> PWR is reduced in the moment but will be at its normal level in the >> evening. The duration depends on the number of active stations over the >> time... >> >> 73, GL, Stefan/DK7FC >> >