Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dl05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 3880438000088; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 08:27:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TO6Dd-0002uv-VQ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:25:57 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TO6Dd-0002um-BK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:25:57 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TO6Da-0004g0-ST for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:25:56 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q9GCPo0v029623 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 14:25:50 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q9GCPo5b022849 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 14:25:50 +0200 Message-ID: <507D5247.5040100@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 14:25:43 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: LF, I'm back from MF to LF and will run a WSPR (33%, normal, not slow) transmission on 137.45 kHz. Maybe some of the new receive stations that i saw on MF can be moved to LF by that :-) PWR is reduced in the moment but will be at its normal level in the evening. The duration depends on the number of active stations over the time... [...] Content analysis details: (-1.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 6aac716dc074d63ee3780b79bbe46b5d Subject: LF: WSPR on LF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4ad3507d52b91a62 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none LF, I'm back from MF to LF and will run a WSPR (33%, normal, not slow) transmission on 137.45 kHz. Maybe some of the new receive stations that i saw on MF can be moved to LF by that :-) PWR is reduced in the moment but will be at its normal level in the evening. The duration depends on the number of active stations over the time... 73, GL, Stefan/DK7FC