Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dh03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id AD3ED38000094; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 19:28:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TModa-000868-Ar for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 00:27:26 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TModZ-00085x-Qy for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 00:27:25 +0100 Received: from eterpe-smout.broadpark.no ([80.202.8.16]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TModX-0005qy-DS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 00:27:24 +0100 Received: from ignis-smin.broadpark.no ([80.202.8.11]) by eterpe-smout.broadpark.no (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u3-15.01 64bit (built Feb 12 2010)) with ESMTP id <0MBS00EPPZTLMEA0@eterpe-smout.broadpark.no> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 01:27:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([84.48.212.1]) by ignis-smin.broadpark.no (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u3-15.01 64bit (built Feb 12 2010)) with ESMTPA id <0MBS00DZ0ZTL2360@ignis-smin.broadpark.no> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 01:27:21 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 01:27:21 +0200 From: Steinar Aanesland In-reply-to: <50787B7E.2070709@mbsks.franken.de> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-id: <5078A759.5030602@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 References: <50689DAD.9030205@broadpark.no> <5068ACAF.2040007@mbsks.franken.de> <5068B151.2070200@broadpark.no> <50787B7E.2070709@mbsks.franken.de> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1 X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi all My RX WSPRing is on now. My am sorry, but I was not able to start earlier. Here is the first log. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [80.202.8.16 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.1 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 0cdfd8d5ce44f1724c623c4ac9f44df6 Subject: Re: LF: log from wspring on 600m Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=LINES_OF_YELLING autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d41175078a7955914 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi all My RX WSPRing is on now. My am sorry, but I was not able to start ear= lier. Here is the first log. 2310 -15 -1.8 0.475753 0 DL3NDR JN59 27 2312 -22 -1.2 0.475629 0 DF6NM JN59 27 2312 -4 -1.4 0.475701 0 DK7FC JN49 30 2312 -26 -0.3 0.475769 0 DG3LV JO53 43 2316 -6 -1.1 0.475701 0 DK7FC JN49 30 2318 -23 -1.2 0.475629 0 DF6NM JN59 27 2320 -8 -0.7 0.475701 0 DK7FC JN49 30 2320 -19 -1.5 0.475753 0 DL3NDR JN59 27 2324 -10 -0.5 0.475701 0 DK7FC JN49 30 LA5VNA Steinar loc:jo59jq Malware filtering: strong www.opera.no PS: I still would like to make a wspr-60 experiment trying to receive= =20 =66rom a transmitter with reduced power, but then some of you have to= do=20 the TXing.. Den 12.10.2012 22:20, skrev Roland Bruestle: > Hello Steinar, > do you like to a test with slowWSPR? > We want to compare WSPR 2Min against SlowWSPR 8Min. > I thought we should do a start test. > I'm transmitting normal WSPR and Slow WSPR-2 to the same time. This= cane > seen with normal WSPR. > If this will be ok, than we know the transmision is ok. > After this I'm transmitting normal WSPR and Slow WSPR-8. Than we ca= n see > the SNR change. My be -6dB. > I'm transmitting now: > normal WSPR on 47585Hz > Slow WSPR-2 on 47575Hz > > Please listen if you are interested. Give me report. > > Gr=FC=DFe > Roland > > > > Am 30.09.2012 22:53, schrieb Steinar Aanesland: >> Great, I am looking forward to copy you in slowWSPR :) >> >> I have plans to make my own transmitter, but until then I will sta= y >> RXing . >> >> La5vna >> >> >> Den 30.09.2012 22:33, skrev Roland Bruestle: >>> Hi Steinar, >>> I'm on blacksheep. >>> Yes I'm interested on using wsper-8 or wspr-32. >>> I talked already with Markus. May bee he told this to you. >>> He gave me his soft ware. I have to install it now. >>> When I'm ready I will contact you via blacksheep. >>> I may take some days. >>> >>> Roland >>> >>> >>> Am 30.09.2012 21:29, schrieb Steinar Aanesland: >>>> I ma not sure if you are on blacksheep or yahoo so this goes to = both >>>> groups. >>>> >>>> Have you considered using wsper-8 or wspr-32 on MF? >>>> >>>> >>>> 1912 -31 -0.5 0.501469 0 DG3LV JO53 43 >>>> 1912 -21 0.9 0.501543 0 DL3NDR JN59 27 >>>> 1914 -23 1.0 0.501543 0 DL3NDR JN59 27 >>>> 1916 -23 -1.7 0.501543 0 DL3NDR JN59 27 >>>> 1918 -26 -0.3 0.501469 0 DG3LV JO53 43 >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> LA5VNA Steinar >> loc:jo59jq >> www.opera.no > > >