Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-da01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 1F5EB38000098; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 18:28:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TMngu-0007Lw-8i for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 23:26:48 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TMngt-0007Ln-Nf for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 23:26:47 +0100 Received: from out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.240]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TMngr-0005gn-S0 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 23:26:46 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqYBAHSYeFACZMDo/2dsb2JhbAANOLwOhwcBAQEBAzIBBRFACwkLBAkWDwkDAgECAUUTCAEBh3cUp1qFII4ui1KDHIMhA5VtgRWSCQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,578,1344207600"; d="scan'208";a="387423583" Received: from host-2-100-192-232.as13285.net (HELO [192.168.2.3]) ([2.100.192.232]) by out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 12 Oct 2012 23:26:44 +0100 Message-ID: <50789923.1050903@psk31.plus.com> Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 23:26:43 +0100 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <50783F5D.60809@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <005001cda8a3$dc6059d0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <50785D41.5030100@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <006b01cda8a9$46df9690$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <50787648.9080206@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <50787AD6.3080303@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <50787AD6.3080303@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan Nice signals from your WSPR transvserter. Here is a pic to go to bed with showing your -1dB signal. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: a6b6ffaf48fdddf1ed5c25dc4bf03ee1 Subject: Re: LF: Re: WSPR on the 630m band Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40495078997a7909 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Stefan Nice signals from your WSPR transvserter. Here is a pic to go to bed with showing your -1dB signal. http://i221.photobucket.com/albums/dd243/radiotalk/475khz_zps077e0e98.jpg 73 GN Eddie On 12/10/2012 21:17, Stefan Schäfer wrote: > Wow, its amazing!!!!! 10 TX stations and 23 stations active on MF, > only 40m/30m/20m!!!! > Let's go on air who can!!! > > http://wsprnet.org/drupal/wsprnet/activity > > 73, Stefan > > Am 12.10.2012 21:58, schrieb Stefan Schäfer: >> MF, >> >> WSPR seems to be the mode of the evening, >> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/MF/WSPR12OKT.png >> >> Impressing activity and big signals, interesting to compare. >> >> First far DX RX stations begin to appear! >> >> 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5327 - Release Date: 10/12/12 > > >