Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-di05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id A5F1C38000B85; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 12:12:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TMgSQ-0005P3-87 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 15:43:22 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TMgSP-0005Ou-SA for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 15:43:21 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TMgSO-00049O-Bk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 15:43:20 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q9CEhIUZ007181 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 16:43:18 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q9CEhIwG021509 for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 16:43:18 +0200 Message-ID: <50782C7C.70004@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 16:43:08 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <50782029.2030005@psk31.plus.com> In-Reply-To: <50782029.2030005@psk31.plus.com> X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: That sounds very good Eddie! Congrats to the success! In a few weeks we can operate on the same band :-) 73, GL, Stefan [...] Content analysis details: (-4.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.1 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 87966b345956c8ef3389b993f6a18f4e Subject: Re: LF: 600m WSPR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1da6095078416404aa X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none That sounds very good Eddie! Congrats to the success! In a few weeks we can operate on the same band :-) 73, GL, Stefan PS: I have almost the same new about WSPR on MF, very soon here ;-) Am 12.10.2012 15:50, schrieb g3zjo: > Testing WSPR 500KHz dial. 10W to 6m x 6m inv. L. > > I was impressed with the simplicity and performance of the G3XBM > 472kHz Transverter. So impressed I reproduced it. The power is way > above my usual QRP levels, it released smoke from my power measurement > 50 Ohm load. ! ! > > 73 > > Eddie G3ZJO