Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 680B738000099; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 06:18:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TMFp8-0002Mv-Hx for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:17:02 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TMFp7-0002Ml-Nc for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:17:01 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TMFp3-0005Ui-Vq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:17:00 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q9BAGr3R023303 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 12:16:53 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q9BAGqBb016514 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 12:16:53 +0200 Message-ID: <50769C8B.10907@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 12:16:43 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?U3RlZmFuIFNjaMOkZmVy?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Holger, Thanks for the information/update! Nice to know that they are proceeding and they obviously know what to do :-) The idea with the VHF link is very good but maybe they only need to detune the TX antenna to get much better results. This can be done by a RX/TX relais (22k (ish) resistor across that). Will they try that? Maybe they can reduce the needed efforts... Using Twente SDR is of course another idea for a separated RX but it may be to far during the time the band is still closed or to copy weak local stations... [...] Content analysis details: (-4.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.1 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10 BODY: Message is 5% to 10% HTML obfuscation 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: b707651713bcd4ad9db4bb0f5d794041 Subject: Re: LF: QSP from DK7PE: 2nd DK0SWF Activity October 13/14, 2012 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010807050800090304040006" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408550769d015e7e X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010807050800090304040006 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Holger, Thanks for the information/update! Nice to know that they are proceeding and they obviously know what to do :-) The idea with the VHF link is very good but maybe they only need to detune the TX antenna to get much better results. This can be done by a RX/TX relais (22k (ish) resistor across that). Will they try that? Maybe they can reduce the needed efforts... Using Twente SDR is of course another idea for a separated RX but it may be to far during the time the band is still closed or to copy weak local stations... Unfortunately i am not in Heidelberg this weekend :-( 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 11.10.2012 06:31, schrieb Holger 'Geri' DK8KW DI2BO W1KW: > > *DK0SWF **second **DARC Mainz **630m operation Sat. Oct. 13th > until 14th 2012* > > Members of the DARC group Mainz/Germany will be operating again on > 630m during the coming weekend! They will use a full quarter wave > commercial verical! They will startSaturday, Oct. 13th around 16:00 > UTC , staying on the air until Sunday 14 > ^th around > 06:00 UTC . This time they will try > different receiving antenna types, hoping to improve the receiving > capabilities. > > For example, they will also use a better receiver (now R&S EK70) plus > a specially designed rx/tx filter, a 472 kHz receiving loop and a > second (10km separated) receiving station, linked via VHF. > > Please listen for them on 473,500 kHz for any cq calls. They will also > use 472,500 kHz temporarily but rather like to keep this one free for > other users. QSX on other frequencies (e.g. between 501 and 503 kHz or > even cross-band 80m) will be announced. > > They are looking forward to work some more of the active 630m stations > in EU. Receiving reports and any helpful comments are most welcome via > eMail dk0swf@gmx.de > > The DK0SWF Team > --------------010807050800090304040006 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de id q9BAGr3R023303 Hi Holger,

Thanks for the information/update! Nice to know that they are proceeding and they obviously know what to do :-)

The idea with the VHF link is very good but maybe they only need to detune the TX antenna to get much better results. This can be done by a RX/TX relais (22k (ish) resistor across that). Will they try that? Maybe they can reduce the needed efforts... Using Twente SDR is of course another idea for a separated RX but it may be to far during the time the band is still closed or to copy weak local stations...

Unfortunately i am not in Heidelberg this weekend :-(

73, Stefan/DK7FC


Am 11.10.2012 06:31, schrieb Holger 'Geri' DK8KW DI2BO W1KW:

DK0SWF=C2=A0<= b>second=C2=A0DARC Mainz= =C2=A0630m operation=C2=A0Sat. Oct. 13th=C2=A0until 14th=C2= =A02012

Members of the DARC group Mainz/Germany will be operating again on 630m during the coming weekend! They will use a full quarter wave commercial verical! They will startSatu= rday, Oct. 13th around 16:00 UTC, staying on the air=C2=A0unti= l Sunday 14th=C2=A0around 06:00 UTC. This tim= e they will try different receiving antenna types, hoping to improve the receiving capabilities.=C2=A0

For example, they will also use a better receiver (now R&S EK70) plus a specially designed rx/tx filter, a 472 kHz receiving loop and a second (10km separated) receiving station, linked via VHF.=C2=A0

Please listen for them on 473,500 kHz for any cq calls. They will also use 472,500 kHz temporarily but rather like to keep this one free for other users. QSX on other frequencies (e.g. between 501 and 503 kHz or even cross-band 80m) will be announced.=C2=A0

They are looking forward to work some more of the active 630m stations in EU. Receiving reports and any helpful comments are most welcome via eMail=C2=A0dk0swf@gmx.de

The DK0SWF Team=C2=A0

--------------010807050800090304040006--