Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mb01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 267683800009D; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 16:37:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TM30E-0000sA-VW for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 21:35:38 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TM30E-0000s1-9e for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 21:35:38 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TM30C-0002tV-3U for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 21:35:37 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q9AKZY5m014561 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 22:35:34 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q9AKZXAo002055 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 22:35:33 +0200 Message-ID: <5075DC0D.8010902@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 22:35:25 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5073330C.5060404@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <9f6b78lkqp31qe2pcduiit9lsdvpehiull@4ax.com> In-Reply-To: <9f6b78lkqp31qe2pcduiit9lsdvpehiull@4ax.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi George, During your request it was ON but now it is OFF. You can check the current situation in the lower image at http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_LF_DX_Grabber.html 73, Stefan/DK7FC [...] Content analysis details: (-2.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.1 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: e09cca6d8e44a91eadbdfb3e1b8aec09 Subject: Re: LF: DCF-39 OFF! Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60155075dc764747 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi George, During your request it was ON but now it is OFF. You can check the current situation in the lower image at http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_LF_DX_Grabber.html 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 10.10.2012 17:54, schrieb George Szymanski: > Is it still off? I'm not receiving it anyway. > I have it on my grabber page now. > http://www.du1gm.dxhams.net/LFBandsGrabber.htm > > 73 de George, DU1GM > > > > On Mon, 08 Oct 2012 22:09:48 +0200, you wrote: > > >> Right now DCF-39 is offline! In case someone wants to make some tests! >> >> 73, Stefan >> >