Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-md06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 4DD0338000097; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 16:14:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TLJi3-0005tS-Gf for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2012 21:13:51 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TLJi3-0005tJ-23 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2012 21:13:51 +0100 Received: from elvis.franken.de ([193.175.24.41]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TLJi1-0008Sz-Bd for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2012 21:13:49 +0100 Received: from uucp by elvis.franken.de with local-rmail (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1TLJi0-0005mZ-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2012 22:13:48 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.161] (unknown [192.168.1.161]) by mbsks.zwiebeltuete.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 640F04480AB for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 22:15:04 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <507333E8.6060308@mbsks.franken.de> Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 22:13:28 +0200 From: Roland Bruestle User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120604 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <50689DAD.9030205@broadpark.no> <5068ACAF.2040007@mbsks.franken.de> <5068B151.2070200@broadpark.no> <5070BA68.7010605@mbsks.franken.de> <50714107.30106@broadpark.no> <50731C77.5010308@mbsks.franken.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Markus, Tobias, thank you for your remark. After my test with Tobias I continued for a short time on 475.65kHz. Than switched over to 474,86kHz as I announced yesterday and today in the forum. So every thing went right. We, Tobias and me will continue our test. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -2.1 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 84016abdd353c82964b6d256164a353f Subject: Re: LF: SlowWSPR at 474.2 kHz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030307060301000501060600" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d605a507334251968 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030307060301000501060600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hello Markus, Tobias, thank you for your remark. After my test with Tobias I continued for a short time on 475.65kHz. Than switched over to 474,86kHz as I announced yesterday and today in the forum. So every thing went right. We, Tobias and me will continue our test. Viele Grüße Roland Am 08.10.2012 21:42, schrieb Markus Vester: > Hi Roland, > I'm not listening myself on MF tonight, but according to the DM4TR and > DK7FC grabbers (and also to arithmetics), you are approximately on > 474.86 kHz, same as yesterday's test. > BTW there's nothing sacred about this 660 Hz audio offset. If you like > you can change it at any time in the little SndOutp window, eg. to 1.5 > kHz for the usual WSPR "dial frequency" offset. > Best of luck, > Markus (DF6NM) > > *From:* Roland Bruestle > *Sent:* Monday, October 08, 2012 8:33 PM > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Subject:* Re: LF: SlowWSPR at 474.2kHz > > Hello Steinar, > I'M transmitting SlowWSPR-8 on dial 474.2 with Fc=660Hz or > transmitting requency 478.2kHz. > Everybody is welcome to listen. > > 73 > Roland DL3NDR --------------030307060301000501060600 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hello Markus, Tobias,
thank you for your remark.
After my test with Tobias I continued for a short time on 475.65kHz.
Than switched over to 474,86kHz as I announced yesterday and today in the forum.
So every thing went right.
We, Tobias and me will continue our test.

Viele Grüße
Roland





Am 08.10.2012 21:42, schrieb Markus Vester:
Hi Roland,
 
I'm not listening myself on MF tonight, but according to the DM4TR and DK7FC grabbers (and also to arithmetics), you are approximately on 474.86 kHz, same as yesterday's test.
 
BTW there's nothing sacred about this 660 Hz audio offset. If you like you can change it at any time in the little SndOutp window, eg. to 1.5 kHz for the usual WSPR "dial frequency" offset.
 
Best of luck,
Markus (DF6NM)
 

Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 8:33 PM
Subject: Re: LF: SlowWSPR at 474.2kHz

Hello Steinar,
I'M transmitting SlowWSPR-8 on dial 474.2 with Fc=660Hz or transmitting requency 478.2kHz.
Everybody is welcome to listen.

73
Roland DL3NDR


--------------030307060301000501060600--