Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id BE5E6380000AA; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 10:55:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TLEjE-0003B8-FS for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2012 15:54:44 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TLEjE-0003Az-34 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2012 15:54:44 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TLEjC-0006rc-6b for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2012 15:54:42 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q98EsetP001770 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 16:54:41 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q98EseZb015541 for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 16:54:40 +0200 Message-ID: <5072E92A.4080601@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 16:54:34 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <002c01cda548$76af9820$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <5072E5E2.2080506@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5072E5E2.2080506@gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Dex, Congrats to the YV path again! I saw it in the morning. The SNR of DCF was quite strong between 4...6 UTC and i was active to that time. However nothing... 73, Stefan [...] Content analysis details: (-4.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.1 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 87966b345956c8ef3389b993f6a18f4e Subject: Re: LF: Re: [Lowfer] MP XKO in CT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40815072e9637000 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Dex, Congrats to the YV path again! I saw it in the morning. The SNR of DCF was quite strong between 4...6 UTC and i was active to that time. However nothing... 73, Stefan Am 08.10.2012 16:40, schrieb Dexter McIntyre W4DEX: > jrusgrove@comcast.net wrote: >> Big signals from MP and XKO post sunrise this morning. > I was just informed XKO did also make an appearance on the YV7MAE > grabber this morning: > > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/74746618/LF/YV7MAE_LF_Grabber.html > > I didn't think there was a chance last night when I looked at all the > storms in YV land last evening. > > Dex