Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mg02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 5FE4038000091; Sat, 6 Oct 2012 17:58:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TKcNd-0001C3-Dn for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 22:57:53 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TKcNc-0001Bu-No for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 22:57:52 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TKcNa-0000g9-5K for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 22:57:51 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q96Lvnk0031808 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 6 Oct 2012 23:57:49 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q96LvnhF000802 for ; Sat, 6 Oct 2012 23:57:49 +0200 Message-ID: <5070A94F.10908@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2012 23:57:35 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <004b01cda3ff$f8ecd130$eac67390$@it> In-Reply-To: <004b01cda3ff$f8ecd130$eac67390$@it> X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: That would be a nice transmit site Giorgio! :-) For a grabber in EU i suggest to use a omnidirectional antenna. Use an active E field antenna such as the PA0RDT. You know they work well worldwide. And it is easy to install in that height! [...] Content analysis details: (-4.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.1 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 2b323379b582abbe78ea971e119c2a1c Subject: Re: LF: Remote Grabber Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020301010902060707040907" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60ca5070a9a16674 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020301010902060707040907 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit That would be a nice transmit site Giorgio! :-) For a grabber in EU i suggest to use a omnidirectional antenna. Use an active E field antenna such as the PA0RDT. You know they work well worldwide. And it is easy to install in that height! My own LFMF probe is now in 38m AGL, only. I made some photos in that height in beautiful WX but the mobile phone camers is old :-/ https://www.dropbox.com/sh/woov273k3g7riac/zR83qOx2Pk The probe is mounted in a vitamin C tablet tube :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 06.10.2012 22:20, schrieb IZ2JGB Giorgio Barinetti: > > Hello to all The group. > > In those days i'm planning a remote > > Grabber to be placed in Milano. > > The former IQ2MI site cannot be used due to the presence of The actual > beacon, so i've got a choice of another > > Site. > > http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torre_Branca > > A nice 108 mt high iron tower near the center > > Of Milano. > > Apart of the IP connectivity , pc hardware and so on, > > which antenna do you suggest to use ? > > Thanks, > > Giorgio > --------------020301010902060707040907 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit That would be a nice transmit site Giorgio! :-)

For a grabber in EU i suggest to use a omnidirectional antenna. Use an active E field antenna such as the PA0RDT. You know they work well worldwide. And it is easy to install in that height!

My own LFMF probe is now in 38m AGL, only. I made some photos in that height in beautiful WX but the mobile phone camers is old :-/ https://www.dropbox.com/sh/woov273k3g7riac/zR83qOx2Pk
The probe is mounted in a vitamin C tablet tube :-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC



Am 06.10.2012 22:20, schrieb IZ2JGB Giorgio Barinetti:

Hello to all The group.

 

In those days i'm planning a remote 

Grabber to be placed in Milano.

 

The former IQ2MI site cannot be used due to the presence of The actual beacon, so i've got a choice of another

Site.

 

http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torre_Branca

 

A nice 108 mt high iron tower near the center 

Of Milano.

 

Apart of the IP connectivity , pc hardware and so on,

which antenna do you suggest to use ?

Thanks,

Giorgio

 

--------------020301010902060707040907--