Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dg05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id ECD1338000081; Fri, 5 Oct 2012 18:51:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TKGjI-000486-S9 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2012 23:50:48 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TKGjI-00047x-Fw for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2012 23:50:48 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TKGjG-0005lV-VZ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2012 23:50:47 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q95MokXs025531 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 6 Oct 2012 00:50:46 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q95MojJa015205 for ; Sat, 6 Oct 2012 00:50:46 +0200 Message-ID: <506F6439.4070605@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2012 00:50:33 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <16BC8B3CA8672445BC2A29B4C14A26D438DDF74803@exlnmb01.eur.nsroot.net> In-Reply-To: <16BC8B3CA8672445BC2A29B4C14A26D438DDF74803@exlnmb01.eur.nsroot.net> X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Marco, 472.2 for QRSS is very close to the CW calling frequency which is just 200 Hz below. Tomorrow i'll be back on air on MF, so if you like we can go on with the long QSO ;-) [...] Content analysis details: (-2.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.1 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 7aa9ad08848e488e22e0ff1d71f4ef1d Subject: Re: LF: Calling CQ QRSS3 on 472.7KHz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d410d506f648402df X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Marco, 472.2 for QRSS is very close to the CW calling frequency which is just 200 Hz below. Tomorrow i'll be back on air on MF, so if you like we can go on with the long QSO ;-) 73, Stefan Am 06.10.2012 00:43, schrieb Scholz, Marco: > Hello LF Group, > Calling CQ for a while on 472.7KHz in QRSS3. > Thanks to DM4TR for Grabber, First time i saw there my signal. > Thanks to DL2HRE for short CW QSO before on 472.5. > > Thanks > 73 > Marco, DD7PC >