Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 0EC2C38000087; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 17:53:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TJAO2-0000oe-Hh for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 22:52:18 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TJAO2-0000oV-1S for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 22:52:18 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TJAO0-0006e3-5v for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 22:52:16 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q92LowSf008779 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 23:52:10 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q92LonvR003733 for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 23:50:52 +0200 Message-ID: <506B61B0.7080501@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 23:50:40 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: ,<506A399A.2070800@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Laurence, Am 02.10.2012 23:20, schrieb Laurence KL7UK: > http://kl7uk.com/850.png > > Stefan - heres the part of the circuit concerned - its the coupling > after the 3rd mixer - so its at TX base band frequency, so I can > see perhaps why this C219 could be increased to reduce LF losses, but > not a lot me thinks as the reactance to "Earth" is pretty low at 137 - > the aim is to improve LF without mucking up the HF side so you can > only go so far. Maybe you can make a series resonance for LF by adding a L in series. This L must have a C in parallel or a low self resonance frequency. My first guess... At least a to high C across C219 will make a almost short cut for HF to ground... [...] Content analysis details: (-2.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.1 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 5934134de2d93cab1d5fc440b67de82f Subject: Re: Strefans LF: LF/MF modification of TS850 for LF Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050202040207060101070405" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600d506b62535258 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050202040207060101070405 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Laurence, Am 02.10.2012 23:20, schrieb Laurence KL7UK: > http://kl7uk.com/850.png > > Stefan - heres the part of the circuit concerned - its the coupling > after the 3rd mixer - so its at TX base band frequency, so I can > see perhaps why this C219 could be increased to reduce LF losses, but > not a lot me thinks as the reactance to "Earth" is pretty low at 137 - > the aim is to improve LF without mucking up the HF side so you can > only go so far. Maybe you can make a series resonance for LF by adding a L in series. This L must have a C in parallel or a low self resonance frequency. My first guess... At least a to high C across C219 will make a almost short cut for HF to ground... > > Still very poor LF and MF - nearly no signals from Siberia/Mongolia on > LF - still at least the snow has stayed away. Loran was around 15dB > down from "average" last nite. Getting very dark in the mornings and a > Huge Male Moose ran into a car on the road into work this morning - > both car/driver and Moose didnt make it. R. Tell me when the band opens. BTW i'm 3...5 dB stronger since the last success in december so we may play a lot more this year. Just played arround with a NE612 for the first time in my life ;-) Quite useful IC! It became a 475 kHz transmit mixer (460 kHz LO) and is used in combination with my mechanical filter which i use for MF RX as well. Then applying white noise from the SpecLab SG i can see the resonance curve again, now confirming > 50 dB att. in 2 kHz outside the passband! 73, Stefan/DK7FC --------------050202040207060101070405 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Laurence,

Am 02.10.2012 23:20, schrieb Laurence KL7UK:
http://kl7uk.com/850.png
 
Stefan - heres the part of the circuit concerned - its the coupling after the 3rd mixer - so its at TX base band frequency, so I can see perhaps why this C219 could be increased to reduce LF losses, but not a lot me thinks as the reactance to "Earth" is pretty low at 137 - the aim is to improve LF without mucking up the HF side so you can only go so far.
Maybe you can make a series resonance for LF by adding a L in series. This L must have a C in parallel or a low self resonance frequency. My first guess...
At least a to high C across C219 will make a almost short cut for HF to ground...


 
Still very poor LF and MF - nearly no signals from Siberia/Mongolia on LF - still at least the snow has stayed away. Loran was around 15dB down from "average" last nite. Getting very dark in the mornings and a Huge Male Moose ran into a car on the road into work this morning - both car/driver and Moose didnt make it.
R. Tell me when the band opens. BTW i'm 3...5 dB stronger since the last success in december so we may play a lot more this year.


Just played arround with a NE612 for the first time in my life ;-) Quite useful IC! It became a 475 kHz transmit mixer (460 kHz LO) and is used in combination with my mechanical filter
which i use for MF RX as well. Then applying white noise from the SpecLab SG i can see the resonance curve again, now confirming > 50 dB att. in 2 kHz outside the passband!

73, Stefan/DK7FC
--------------050202040207060101070405--