Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dl01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B8B293800009A; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 12:17:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TJ58w-0007ku-UY for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 17:16:22 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TJ58w-0007kl-B3 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 17:16:22 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TJ58t-0005IQ-M1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 17:16:21 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q92GGIoJ007298 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 18:16:18 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q92GGHoe028969 for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 18:16:17 +0200 Message-ID: <506B1349.1000903@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 18:16:09 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <506A399A.2070800@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <000b01cda092$fb968ef0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> In-Reply-To: <000b01cda092$fb968ef0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Jay, Anyway thanks for watching. Yes i saw DST values of abt -40 nT. So there is no chance, as you explained some time ago.. However 2 days ago, there was the best reception of Edgar J. Twining so far, with clear parts of 7 and F, see https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/DK7FC%20WR%20ver%20spectrum%20-24.PNG No need to compare with a reference spectrogram. [...] Content analysis details: (-4.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.1 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 1e15d6d6179985f133b43d42d658878a Subject: Re: LF: T/A Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090205010200090202050805" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TITLE_EMPTY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4acf506b13a513cd X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090205010200090202050805 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Jay, Anyway thanks for watching. Yes i saw DST values of abt -40 nT. So there is no chance, as you explained some time ago.. However 2 days ago, there was the best reception of Edgar J. Twining so far, with clear parts of 7 and F, see https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/DK7FC%20WR%20ver%20spectrum%20-24.PNG No need to compare with a reference spectrogram. Interestingly this was to the time of my sunset, not to the time of his sunrise, which makes a difference of 2.5 hours. Looks like the EU autumn is suitable for the LF VK path too. 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 02.10.2012 13:42, schrieb jrusgrove@comcast.net: > Stefan > No joy on your DFCW last night ... > Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 --------------090205010200090202050805 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Jay,

Anyway thanks for watching. Yes i saw DST values of abt -40 nT. So there is no chance, as you explained some time ago..
However 2 days ago, there was the best reception of Edgar J. Twining so far, with clear parts of 7 and F, see https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/DK7FC%20WR%20ver%20spectrum%20-24.PNG
No need to compare with a reference spectrogram.

Interestingly this was to the time of my sunset, not to the time of his sunrise, which makes a difference of 2.5 hours. Looks like the EU autumn is suitable for the LF VK path too.

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 02.10.2012 13:42, schrieb jrusgrove@comcast.net:
Stefan
 
No joy on your DFCW last night ...
 
Jay W1VD  WD2XNS  WE2XGR/2
 
 
--------------090205010200090202050805--