Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 0CF5338000087; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 20:48:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TIqe7-0006o0-Cr for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 01:47:35 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TIqe6-0006nr-Pi for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 01:47:34 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TIqe3-0001qz-N2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 01:47:33 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q920lUTZ013703 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 02:47:30 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q920lUQZ003276 for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 02:47:30 +0200 Message-ID: <506A399A.2070800@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 02:47:22 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Laurence, Have you tried to check the increase of the signal voltage at higher frequencies to see what e.g. doubling of that C causes? Is there no increase at all? Do you have the schematic of that section? [...] Content analysis details: (-2.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.1 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: b2000330e4064ca60a9f57e731b892da Subject: Re: LF: LF/MF modification of TS850 for LF Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030605010004010007050605" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40cd506a39d74c2c X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030605010004010007050605 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Laurence, Have you tried to check the increase of the signal voltage at higher frequencies to see what e.g. doubling of that C causes? Is there no increase at all? Do you have the schematic of that section? 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 02.10.2012 02:31, schrieb Laurence KL7UK: > > Looking for a bit of assistance. > > Ive modded my TS850 to allow LF/MF transmit from info from > http://we0h.us/Amateur_Radio_stuff/TS850/ts_850_lf_tx_mod.pdf (thanks > Mike, original by Bob ZL2CA) but the > "supplemental" parallel capacitor value in uF to increase the LF level > isnt mentioned. > > Ive actually tried another 0.01 and smaller and higher values but at > 137kHz it doesnt appear to increase the level - any takers or > experiences out there who have modded the beast? > > We had a load of snow here at the weekend but thankfully its gone > already and Im in the garden pulling up new ropes into 2 Spruce trees > - a bit stronger than the bendy Birch and Ill attempt to pull up the > loop this week. The loop will be slightly bigger, about 50m in length > and slightly higher than WD2XDW in Bartlesville. We will see. > COnditions are lousy at LF and MF given the Geo/Mag at this latitude > but I was hearing Eu on 20m over the Pole pre dawn. We lose nearly 6 > mins of sun per day at this time of year.... > > Laurence KL1X > > > > "The TS-850 transmit drive to the transverter port is reasonably > broadband as manufactured, and passes > > > some LF energy for amplification using an external LF amplifier. It is > difficult to modify the TS-850 > > > circuitry to decrease the LF droop without impacting on response at > other HF bands. One modification > > > to improve low frequency response is to supplement the value of C219 > (a 0.01 uF capacitor, located > > > near L88). It is possible to solder a parallel capacitor to the top > side of the RF Unit PCB. Otherwise > > > the "broadband" circuits in the TS-850 transmit drive are accepted for > what they are. With C219 > > > supplemented in value, 180 kHz output from IF OUT 1 is between about > 100 and 250 millivolts, > > > whereas on HF it is more like 1 volt." --------------030605010004010007050605 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Laurence,

Have you tried to check the increase of the signal voltage at higher frequencies to see what e.g. doubling of that C causes? Is there no increase at all?
Do you have the schematic of that section?

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 02.10.2012 02:31, schrieb Laurence KL7UK:

Looking for a bit of assistance.
 
 Ive modded my TS850 to allow LF/MF transmit from info from  http://we0h.us/Amateur_Radio_stuff/TS850/ts_850_lf_tx_mod.pdf  (thanks Mike, original by Bob ZL2CA)  but the "supplemental" parallel capacitor value in uF to increase the LF level isnt mentioned.
 
Ive actually tried another 0.01 and smaller and higher values but at 137kHz it doesnt appear to increase the level - any takers or experiences out there who have modded the beast?
 
We had a load of snow here at the weekend but thankfully its gone already and Im in the garden pulling up new ropes into 2 Spruce trees - a bit stronger than the bendy Birch and Ill attempt to pull up the loop this week. The loop will be slightly bigger, about 50m in length and slightly higher than WD2XDW in Bartlesville. We will see. COnditions are lousy at LF and MF given the Geo/Mag at this latitude but I was hearing Eu on 20m over the Pole pre dawn. We lose nearly 6 mins of sun per day at this time of year....
 
Laurence KL1X
 
 
 

"The TS-850 transmit drive to the transverter port is reasonably broadband as manufactured, and passes


some LF energy for amplification using an external LF amplifier. It is difficult to modify the TS-850


circuitry to decrease the LF droop without impacting on response at other HF bands. One modification


to improve low frequency response is to supplement the value of C219 (a 0.01 uF capacitor, located


near L88). It is possible to solder a parallel capacitor to the top side of the RF Unit PCB. Otherwise


the "broadband" circuits in the TS-850 transmit drive are accepted for what they are. With C219


supplemented in value, 180 kHz output from IF OUT 1 is between about 100 and 250 millivolts,


whereas on HF it is more like 1 volt."
--------------030605010004010007050605--