Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mg05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 4B82B38004BAC; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 12:57:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TOWXS-0007Ul-KB for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 17:32:10 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TOWXS-0007Uc-3N for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 17:32:10 +0100 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TOWXP-0003Lx-Pu for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 17:32:09 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 17 Oct 2012 16:32:02 -0000 Received: from tmo-111-159.customers.d1-online.com (EHLO [100.100.29.223]) [80.187.111.159] by mail.gmx.net (mp020) with SMTP; 17 Oct 2012 18:32:02 +0200 X-Authenticated: #20581925 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/cp+UgyTzc403Ym88jOOpwYhcK1C5FR4EtOYe1bH W+NmL96eKYmjUm User-Agent: GMX Mail for Android MIME-Version: 1.0 From: vorharz Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 18:31:42 +0200 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-ID: <222fd8e0-2857-4d6b-87eb-bb6aba1dceb6@email.android.com> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan , 539 hr ur sigs right now on 136.172 UFB 73 es gl DL9OLI -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android Mobiltelefon mit GMX Mail gesendet. "Stefan Schäfer" schrieb: [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [213.165.64.22 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (vorharz[at]gmx.de) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: b08ad821341ca291e1fd930f7b9292d3 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----5NIRPIRQAENR28DKJARX7J1PAQGKO0" Subject: Re: LF: DL to DU X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60cd507ee363003c X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none ------5NIRPIRQAENR28DKJARX7J1PAQGKO0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Stefan , 539 hr ur sigs right now on 136.172 UFB 73 es gl DL9OLI -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android Mobiltelefon mit GMX Mail gesendet. "Stefan Schäfer" schrieb: George, I will transmit DFCW-180 this evening on 136.172 kHz. Start time is 16 UTC. Maybe you will see some traces... 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 16.10.2012 15:48, schrieb George Szymanski: > You never know Stefan I might get a weak trace from you overnight! > > I'm too stupid to use Spec lab! > I will try the Twente receiver but my internet is so very slow it > might not work well enough. > > 73 de George, DU1GM > > > On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:20:29 +0200, you wrote: > > >> Hi George, >> >> There is no chance for you to display normal WSPR from me over that >> distance in a spectrogram. Maybe you could display WSPR-32 but this is >> still to optimistic i think. We really have to start in something like >> QRSS-120 or DFCW-180 and then see what comes out. >> >> I have no idea how to set Argo for optimal displaying DFCW-180 since i >> don't use the new version of the program. Furthermore i am very >> convinced by using Spectrum Lab for LF/MF detection. Yes, the program is >> much more complex but it offers some essential features! The band >> limiting and noise blanking will reduce the QRN very significantly! The >> improvement can vary from a few to 10 dB, depending on the kind of >> noise. I will try to generate a new spectrogram soon, showing this effect. >> I don't know if Argo allows noise cancelling. But if you loose say 6 dB >> SNR, that makes a difference from invisible to O copy. >> >> Did you try the Twente WEB SDR link i sent you? This is also useful to >> check if the reference signal you're using is available at present. I'm >> daily listening to AM BCD stns for many hours a day :-) >> >> As said, if you like i can give you some advice how to run a DCF-plot. >> >> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >> >> >> > ------5NIRPIRQAENR28DKJARX7J1PAQGKO0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Stefan , 539 hr ur sigs right now on 136.172
UFB

73 es gl DL9OLI
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android Mobiltelefon mit GMX Mail gesendet.



"Stefan Schäfer" <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> schrieb:
George,

I will transmit DFCW-180 this evening on 136.172 kHz. Start time is 16 
UTC. Maybe you will see some traces...

73, Stefan/DK7FC



Am 16.10.2012 15:48, schrieb George Szymanski:
> You never know Stefan I might get a weak trace from you overnight!
>
> I'm too stupid to use Spec lab!
> I will try the Twente receiver but my internet is so very slow it
> might not work well enough.
>
> 73 de George, DU1GM
>
>
> On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:20:29 +0200, you wrote:
>
>    
>> Hi George,
>>
>> There is no chance for you to display normal WSPR from me over that
>> distance in a spectrogram. Maybe you could display WSPR-32 but this is
>> still to optimistic i think. We really have to start in something like<
 br
/>>> QRSS-120 or DFCW-180 and then see what comes out.
>>
>> I have no idea how to set Argo for optimal displaying DFCW-180 since i
>> don't use the new version of the program. Furthermore i am very
>> convinced by using Spectrum Lab for LF/MF detection. Yes, the program is
>> much more complex but it offers some essential features! The band
>> limiting and noise blanking will reduce the QRN very significantly! The
>> improvement can vary from a few to 10 dB, depending on the kind of
>> noise.  I will try to generate a new spectrogram soon, showing this effect.
>> I don't know if Argo allows noise cancelling. But if you loose say 6 dB
>> SNR, that makes a difference from invisible to O copy.
>>
>> Did you try the Twente WEB SDR link i sent you? This is also useful to
>> check if the reference signal you're using is available at p
 resent.
I'm
>> daily listening to AM BCD stns for many hours a day :-)
>>
>> As said, if you like i can give you some advice how to run a DCF-plot.
>>
>> 73, Stefan/DK7FC
>>
>>
>>      
>

------5NIRPIRQAENR28DKJARX7J1PAQGKO0--