Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mk05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id BEA3238000091; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:27:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TR8TU-0003I9-3f for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 22:26:52 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TR8TT-0003I0-JL for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 22:26:51 +0100 Received: from smtpout1.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.29] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TR8TR-0001hC-Ex for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 22:26:50 +0100 Received: from AGB ([2.26.47.29]) by mwinf5d12 with ME id F9So1k00A0dmnFE039So33; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 23:26:49 +0200 Message-ID: <0FF60A9A0CE14FA3A6BEF23DD66D57E4@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <508715CE.3000701@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <0D53475605DF40F08BF596E29708823E@AGB> <5087BF86.5010804@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <418E090825C04DFB81593EA54244F640@AGB>,<50884AFC.4020108@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 22:26:48 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: PP Laurence ? May be the 18 k signal takes a different (ground wave ?)path , I noticed things looked a little sparse over that side , but thanks for trying the Op system , may be its still a little early ? [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: ad9c0e3658f56f4dbb01cd425a6a8031 Subject: Re: LF: OP32 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_004B_01CDB236.A85B0D50" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d618950885d4677cc X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_004B_01CDB236.A85B0D50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable PP Laurence ? May be the 18 k signal takes a different (ground wave ?)path , I = noticed things looked a little sparse over that side , but thanks = for trying the Op system , may be its still a little early ? 73-G.. From: Laurence KL1 X=20 Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 10:18 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: RE: LF: OP32 We had visual Aurora here in South Central Alaska and no decodes from = anyone I think running Op 32 - it was also very windy in a small = Katabatic at our QTH gustiung 45-50mph - inside where it was windy it = was 32F and outside calm, just a mile or so 15F or less. =20 Just needs to quieten down for a few more days but I think Im going to = be dissapointed. At least SAQ was seen even whilst the 137 Opera was = blasting away! =20 =20 Laurence WE2XPQ Part 5 KL 1 X =20 > Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 22:09:32 +0200 > From: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: Re: LF: OP32 >=20 >=20 > Am 24.10.2012 18:27, schrieb Graham: > > > > May be the path east was better , as you have the same s/n=20 > > over similar distance , where as east is over land ? > > > > UA0AET is showing as decoding at JA at the moment , may be=20 > > now is a good time to try Tx while JA is in darkness >=20 > The path to JA is (was) not open today, see the DCF plot at=20 > http://icas.to/argo/eu.htm > Yesterday the QRN was way lower and the signal levels about the same,=20 > i.e. the SNR was much better. And i was active to that time of the=20 > highest DCF S/N. Anyway no trace at JA8SCD. It's more than twice the=20 > distance to JA, compared to UA0AET. >=20 > It's interesting that good decode levels, or clear spectrograms, can = be=20 > seen at UA0SNV. As you say, that distance over land is quite a = challenge. >=20 > But be sure, it is more likely to leave a trace to the right time and=20 > right frequency than making a OP32 decode. That applies for the path = to=20 > DU1GM too, of course. >=20 > 73, Stefan/DK7FC >=20 >=20 > > > > UA0AET JA8SCD 2200m OPERA 4163 kms 13:53:08 > > > > 73 -G..=20 >=20 ------=_NextPart_000_004B_01CDB236.A85B0D50 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
PP  Laurence  ?
 
May be the  18 k signal  = takes  a=20 different  (ground wave ?)path , I noticed  things  = looked =20 a  little  sparse  over that  side , but = thanks =20 for  trying  the  Op system  , may  be its = still =20 a little  early  ?
 
73-G..

From: Laurence KL1 X
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 10:18 PM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= =20
Subject: RE: LF: OP32

We had visual Aurora here in South Central Alaska = and no=20 decodes from anyone I think running Op 32 - it was also very windy = in a=20 small Katabatic at our QTH gustiung 45-50mph - inside where it was windy = it was=20 32F and outside calm, just a mile or so 15F or less.
 
Just = needs to=20 quieten down for a few more days but I think Im going to be = dissapointed. At=20 least SAQ was seen even whilst the 137 Opera was blasting=20 away!
 
 
Laurence WE2XPQ Part 5  KL 1 = X
 
> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 22:09:32 = +0200
> From: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de
> To:=20 rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> Subject: Re: LF: OP32
> =
>=20
> Am 24.10.2012 18:27, schrieb Graham:
> >
> > = May be=20 the path east was better , as you have the same s/n
> > over = similar=20 distance , where as east is over land ?
> >
> > UA0AET = is=20 showing as decoding at JA at the moment , may be
> > now is a = good=20 time to try Tx while JA is in darkness
>
> The path to JA = is (was)=20 not open today, see the DCF plot at
> = http://icas.to/argo/eu.htm
>=20 Yesterday the QRN was way lower and the signal levels about the same, =
>=20 i.e. the SNR was much better. And i was active to that time of the =
>=20 highest DCF S/N. Anyway no trace at JA8SCD. It's more than twice the =
>=20 distance to JA, compared to UA0AET.
>
> It's interesting = that good=20 decode levels, or clear spectrograms, can be
> seen at UA0SNV. As = you=20 say, that distance over land is quite a challenge.
>
> But = be sure,=20 it is more likely to leave a trace to the right time and
> right=20 frequency than making a OP32 decode. That applies for the path to =
> DU1GM=20 too, of course.
>
> 73, Stefan/DK7FC
>
> =
>=20 >
> > UA0AET JA8SCD 2200m OPERA 4163 kms 13:53:08
>=20 >
> > 73 -G..
>
------=_NextPart_000_004B_01CDB236.A85B0D50--