Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 1FE1538000082; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 19:40:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TSc9k-0001el-Bj for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 23:20:36 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TSc9j-0001ec-PO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 23:20:35 +0000 Received: from qmta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.48]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TSc9h-0004Oq-RJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 23:20:34 +0000 Received: from omta17.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.89]) by qmta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id GlfW1k0051vXlb855nLbpE; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 23:20:35 +0000 Received: from JAYDELL ([71.234.119.9]) by omta17.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id GnLe1k00G0CFS1j3dnLeVK; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 23:20:38 +0000 Message-ID: <00ac01cdb562$d26d3fd0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> From: To: References: <508D47B2.8060209@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <46A9A1D9FC954A658216B197782524BF@White> <891CD59233F844C283BAC09A2AAA04BA@White> <508D6A9D.4020600@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <508D6C1A.7050607@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <508D8084.6020501@freenet.de> <508DBB57.8050408@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 19:20:29 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 2.3 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan Hard to know for sure what the DST is without Colorado reporting but 'normalizing' Tokyo's numbers it should be good for T/A. Will look for your JT9-10 after 0130Z ... TX and RX here is tied up until then. [...] Content analysis details: (2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.62.48 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jrusgrove[at]comcast.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 2.9 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_4379D AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_4379D X-Scan-Signature: 622b0ca3461797caf37867321c193763 Subject: LF: Re: JT9-10 for TA distances on LF? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00A8_01CDB541.4B0346A0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408f508dc28a7ec0 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00A8_01CDB541.4B0346A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Stefan Hard to know for sure what the DST is without Colorado reporting but 'normalizing' Tokyo's numbers it should be good for T/A. Will look for your JT9-10 after 0130Z ... TX and RX here is tied up until then. Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 ----- Original Message ----- From: Stefan Schäfer To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2012 7:10 PM Subject: LF: JT9-10 for TA distances on LF? Thank you Wolf! Probably it is a good idea to QSY to JT9-10 for the night. Is someone in the US ready to go on 137.43 kHz? Waiting for reply before i QSY. 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 28.10.2012 19:59, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf: Still many more decodes from DK7FC, even though stronger, than from DF2JP. I don't think Stefan's timing is the cause.. see this spectrogram with lower frequency-, but larger time resolution: From that over, only 'CQ DF2JP JO31' was decoded. I have saved wave files from a couple of overs, all with basically the same decoding result. 73, Wolf DL4YHF . ------=_NextPart_000_00A8_01CDB541.4B0346A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Stefan
 
Hard to know for sure what the DST is = without=20 Colorado reporting but 'normalizing' Tokyo's numbers it should = be good for=20 T/A. Will look for your JT9-10 after 0130Z ... TX and RX = here is tied=20 up until then.
 
Jay W1VD  WD2XNS  = WE2XGR/2
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Stefan = Sch=E4fer
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2012 = 7:10=20 PM
Subject: LF: JT9-10 for TA = distances on=20 LF?

Thank you Wolf!

Probably it is a good idea to = QSY to=20 JT9-10 for the night. Is someone in the US ready to go on 137.43 kHz? = Waiting=20 for reply before i QSY.

73, Stefan/DK7FC



Am = 28.10.2012=20 19:59, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf:=20
Still = many more=20 decodes from DK7FC, even though stronger, than from DF2JP.
I = don't think=20 Stefan's timing is the cause.. see this spectrogram with lower = frequency-,=20 but larger time resolution:



From that over, only 'CQ = DF2JP=20 JO31' was decoded.
I have saved wave files from a couple of = overs, all=20 with basically the same decoding result.

73, Wolf  = DL4YHF=20 .

------=_NextPart_000_00A8_01CDB541.4B0346A0--