Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dl04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 8A1A73800008C; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 11:21:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TLF7s-0003Ji-SS for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2012 16:20:12 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TLF7s-0003JZ-BY for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2012 16:20:12 +0100 Received: from qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.56]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TLF7p-0006ym-SE for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2012 16:20:11 +0100 Received: from omta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.27]) by qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 8evb1k0020bG4ec56fLBAj; Mon, 08 Oct 2012 15:20:11 +0000 Received: from DELL4 ([71.234.119.9]) by omta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 8fKv1k00N0CFS1j3PfKvbm; Mon, 08 Oct 2012 15:19:56 +0000 Message-ID: <003601cda568$65ce1980$6d01a8c0@DELL4> From: To: References: <50720124.8080007@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <002801cda547$eb1bc860$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <5072DCDE.1080005@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 11:20:05 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan Alan is encouraged to step into the discussion and set us straight ... but I believe that the colorado.edu DST chart is a 'best estimate' prediction. The 'actual' DST levels for the period are supplied at a later date after more data is gathered. So it's conceivable that it may be off in terms of level and timing. Also, it's not uncommon to see 'some' time lag on propagation improvement once DST levels have risen. Perhaps there is 'some' delay on the 'leading edge' of the event as well. [...] Content analysis details: (0.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.62.56 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jrusgrove[at]comcast.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -2.1 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 2.8 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_4379D AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_4379D X-Scan-Signature: ce0e5a4ae990e5a63db3ab7aea21191b Subject: Re: LF: T/A Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-15"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4ad25072ef6d74c0 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Stefan Alan is encouraged to step into the discussion and set us straight ... but I believe that the colorado.edu DST chart is a 'best estimate' prediction. The 'actual' DST levels for the period are supplied at a later date after more data is gathered. So it's conceivable that it may be off in terms of level and timing. Also, it's not uncommon to see 'some' time lag on propagation improvement once DST levels have risen. Perhaps there is 'some' delay on the 'leading edge' of the event as well. Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer" To: Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 10:02 AM Subject: Re: LF: T/A Hi Jay, Thanks for monitoring and the report. Didn't you say there is no chance when DST levels are below - 20 nT? Why was the SNR so good this time? 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 08.10.2012 13:27, schrieb jrusgrove@comcast.net: > Stefan & T/A enthusiasts > > 20 dB+ s/n in 28 mHz last night despite Tstorms off the east coast. DST was already on the > downslide during the reception period but seemed to have little effect on your signal ... ending > up at about -40 nT at the 0600Z fadeout. Currently DST at -110 nT ... ;~( > > http://www.w1vd.com/interestinggrab.html . > > Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer" > To: > Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2012 6:24 PM > Subject: LF: Beacon to the west > > >> LF, >> >> This night i'm on 136.172 kHz again, running good old DFCW-90 to the world until about 6 UTC. >> >> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >> >