Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dh04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 388F038000534; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 07:11:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TTWBq-0001by-Cz for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 11:10:30 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TTWBp-0001bp-Ru for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 11:10:29 +0000 Received: from out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.241]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TTWBn-0001rp-VD for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 11:10:28 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApcVAIYGkVBcHYFb/2dsb2JhbABEikW4IgECgQKBCYIZBQEBBAEIAQEDPA0CFAoIBgEBAwUCAQMRAwEBAQEJJRQBBBoGEAEFCAYTCgECAgEBDYdiCrt7i3h1CIEjhBsDiCWFS5hIgm+BWwc X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,687,1344207600"; d="scan'208";a="398339178" Received: from host-92-29-129-91.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.29.129.91]) by out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 31 Oct 2012 11:10:06 +0000 Message-ID: <003301cdb758$46596080$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <50904AD0.5070306@broadpark.no> <50904BB6.4010905@xs4all.nl> <50904E73.9030402@psk31.plus.com> <50904F8F.90505@xs4all.nl> <509056D9.2050107@psk31.plus.com> <50906946.4010308@princeton.edu> <5091045A.8070005@psk31.plus.com> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 11:10:02 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 3.8 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: ----- Original Message ----- From: "g3zjo" To: Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 10:58 AM Subject: Re: LF: PA0A log > Hi Joe > On 30/10/2012 23:56, Joe Taylor wrote: > > Hi Eddie, > > > > G3ZJO wrote: > >> I will leave it for another day, and possibly get rid of these false > >> de-codes, as below, copied from Steinar's post, I am getting them by the > >> dozen on two XP RX/Computer set ups it could be related to the huge > >> input signal levels which are even more uncontrollable on v 02r2706. > >> Transmit audio levels are also far too high. > > > > Surely you must know that audio levels are controlled by external > > circuitry and by the Windows "Volume controls" for input and output. > > Nothing regarding the setting of audio levels has been changed in any > > of these released versions of WSJT-X. > > > Indeed, Grandma does know how to suck eggs. And that is what I have been > saying all along. WSPR and all other Ham Software on all of my Radios > and Computers accept the standard level of Audio from the Radio via the > Windows slider which needs to be set at a reasonable point to give 0dB > for WSPR, acceptable levels for Spectrum Lab etc. WSJT-X needs the > slider one step off zero (they are not slider pots at all of course they > are digi level steps). Very careful delicate fiddling to get on the > first step up from Zero sets the level to 30dB ish the waterfall > overloads and -20dB of Gain adjustment still leaves PA0O signal looking > overloaded. Getting 12 decodes of 15P6715P67WCV after each transmission [...] Content analysis details: (3.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 3.8 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: 79aab7440207271f32757adc503f8c76 Subject: Re: LF: PA0A log Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4118509107534730 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none ----- Original Message ----- From: "g3zjo" To: Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 10:58 AM Subject: Re: LF: PA0A log > Hi Joe > On 30/10/2012 23:56, Joe Taylor wrote: > > Hi Eddie, > > > > G3ZJO wrote: > >> I will leave it for another day, and possibly get rid of these false > >> de-codes, as below, copied from Steinar's post, I am getting them by the > >> dozen on two XP RX/Computer set ups it could be related to the huge > >> input signal levels which are even more uncontrollable on v 02r2706. > >> Transmit audio levels are also far too high. > > > > Surely you must know that audio levels are controlled by external > > circuitry and by the Windows "Volume controls" for input and output. > > Nothing regarding the setting of audio levels has been changed in any > > of these released versions of WSJT-X. > > > Indeed, Grandma does know how to suck eggs. And that is what I have been > saying all along. WSPR and all other Ham Software on all of my Radios > and Computers accept the standard level of Audio from the Radio via the > Windows slider which needs to be set at a reasonable point to give 0dB > for WSPR, acceptable levels for Spectrum Lab etc. WSJT-X needs the > slider one step off zero (they are not slider pots at all of course they > are digi level steps). Very careful delicate fiddling to get on the > first step up from Zero sets the level to 30dB ish the waterfall > overloads and -20dB of Gain adjustment still leaves PA0O signal looking > overloaded. Getting 12 decodes of 15P6715P67WCV after each transmission WHAT DOES THIS 15P6715P67WCV MEAN. I AND OTHERS ARE GETTING THIS DECODE ?????????????----------IT SEEMS CONSISTANT and not random gibberish > seems to me to indicate overload. I can assure you that each with each > release the situation has got worse. > When I return to use WSPR on the same set ups I have to increase the > audio via the Windows slider by 18dB i.e. WSPR will be indicating red > and reading -18dB > > > For Rx, reduce the audio signal (or turn down the Windows input > > slider) until the WSJT-X audio meter is somewhere around 20-30 dB. > > > I am using Win XP SP3 exclusively and the DirectX Realtec HD Audio input > seems best suited on all computers. My Samsung Netbook is used with > another RX to monitor my transmission, I have no antenna in the rig. > When I TX the Radio S Meter shows no signal but of course I can hear it. > Since ver 2r02706 the waterfall turns bright pink, I can set waterfall > Gain down 30dB > and visually it is still overloaded, each transmission brings 12 decodes > of 15P671567WCV with a few other odd ones mixed including some fine > Arabic symbols. Prior to this version using the exact same set up I > could have an antenna in the rig, see a signal of S9 20dB and de code my > signal and my signal only which enabled me to to do tests with my > frequency stability. > > For Tx, move the Windows slider down until you have the level your > > transmitter wants, or insert an external resistive divider. > > > My standard computer interfaces which work fine with all other Ham > software including WSPR and OPERA (got to get that mention in) on all > Rigs and Computers, in and out of the shack, shows excessive audio > levels with WSJT-X. I regularly drive transverters and run Digi Modes > QRP from from my rigs. Setting the required levels is a simple matter > using the Wave and Output Windows sliders including for WSPR. Using > WSJT-X the Wave slider has to be on that dreaded first step up from Zero > and the Output slider is a real pain to get set to a level suitable for > my Transverter one step further up the slider and we are into over > driving or even wrecking the mixer. Why on earth should I need an > external resistive divider in addition to the one already in the > transverter only for WSJT-X? > On the Samsung Netbook the Wave control is inoperative when running > WSJT-X causing even more pain, yet with WSPR it operates as normal. > Seems there is an anomaly to be sorted here too. > >> Maybe 15P6715P67WCV means something I do get a few variations also. > > > > If you get a false decode and can't understand why, please send me the > > file that you saved. I very rarely see any here, and if set up > > properly you shouldn't, either. > Well perhaps we expect you to be overloaded with data from others. > I think I do understand the false decodes, I think they are due to the > overload circumstances I have explained. > > Eddie > > > > -- Joe, K1JT > > > > > > > > ----- > > No virus found in this message. > > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > > Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5364 - Release Date: 10/30/12 > > > > > >