Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mb04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id BE213380000D8; Tue, 9 Oct 2012 13:14:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TLd9F-0006fr-RO for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 09 Oct 2012 17:59:13 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TLd9F-0006fi-Eb for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 09 Oct 2012 17:59:13 +0100 Received: from out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.237]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TLd9D-0004FR-MM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 09 Oct 2012 17:59:12 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgwSAClXdFBcHneg/2dsb2JhbABFij+zbAOBAoEJghsFAQEEAQgBAQMlASMCLAEBAwUCAQMRBAEBCiUUAQQaBhYIBhMKAQICAQGHbgqrVJA/izl1gX2DIQONaJgygm0 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,561,1344207600"; d="scan'208";a="406124643" Received: from host-92-30-119-160.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.30.119.160]) by out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 09 Oct 2012 17:59:10 +0100 Message-ID: <002b01cda63f$64943f40$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <50731B6C.2060506@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <50732867.7070201@telia.com> <5074294B.80807@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <50743561.9060504@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <001501cda635$eeda16c0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <50744F77.5020805@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 16:59:05 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 4.4 (++++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan There will be strong competition from January for DX contacts so you will need to get your Rx problems solved to keep up. One way TX is not an option. QSO CW mode is the preferred option on MF and not Beacons churning out callsign es locator g3kev [...] Content analysis details: (4.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 4.4 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: 086f3faad0220c9ae57a7913e711a86d Subject: Re: LF: active antenna output termination? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d601850745b7120b9 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Stefan There will be strong competition from January for DX contacts so you will need to get your Rx problems solved to keep up. One way TX is not an option. QSO CW mode is the preferred option on MF and not Beacons churning out callsign es locator g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer" To: Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 4:23 PM Subject: Re: LF: active antenna output termination? > > Am 09.10.2012 17:51, schrieb mal hamilton: > > [...] > > Even a modest sized loaded vertical gives enough signal capture, has hi-Q on > > the frequncy of interest when resonated followed by a good well designed > > sensitive RX > > > > ...but i want to run MF and LF to the same time, regardless to which > band the TX system is actually resonated. It was also shown that my > transmit antenne always worked poor as a RX antenna. > > BTW i should build a detector RX using a diode, a cap and a loudspeaker > in addition with the transmit antenna resonated to 1143 kHz. I bet one > could hear AFN in 50m distance from the speaker :-) > > 73, Stefan >