Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 3604B3800009F; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 16:55:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TFWig-0004EB-G4 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 21:54:34 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TFWig-0004E2-0h for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 21:54:34 +0100 Received: from smtpout2.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.42] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TFWid-0000BK-N8 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 21:54:32 +0100 Received: from AGB ([2.26.45.164]) by mwinf5d20 with ME id 2LuW1k00L3YXwSi03LuWRg; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 22:54:31 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Graham" To: References: <41E179E8BC3D497AB344D966959A61C6@White> <505D0DB5.4080108@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <386BA5055A494FEC9164314A593DCB8D@White> <000901cd98a8$7cd20a00$76761e00$@com> <505DB5C3.2040901@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <972D0C66C74A41968A7D806701F5EDD6@AGB> <505E001A.4090301@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <505E001A.4090301@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 21:54:30 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan If you can generate the signal of your previous tests , I don't think the range will be that short !! Due to the long tx pulses of OP4 Hr , the signal will also show on spec-lab , so test data is not lost , if decode fails . [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.42 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: e21031ef48bbae1c5a8c64549547751e Subject: Re: LF: Experimental software for WSPR-8 and -32 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0099_01CD990C.D8136760" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4091505e25b454b1 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0099_01CD990C.D8136760 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Stefan If you can generate the signal of your previous tests , I don't = think the range will be that short !! Due to the long tx pulses of OP4 Hr , the signal will also show = on spec-lab , so test data is not lost , if decode fails . The software produces the 8K audio tone via the sound card and = has the com-port on/off keying output as well , normal sound cards = are suitable , the software inputs directly at 8K using sound = card as SDR=20 If you have a target date , I can post in the Op group for = monitor's=20 73-G. From: Stefan Sch=E4fer=20 Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 7:14 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: Re: LF: Experimental software for WSPR-8 and -32 I'll give it a try Graham. The problem may be to find monitoring = stations in a short range... 73, Stefan Am 22.09.2012 17:20, schrieb Graham:=20 And of course there is a 240 SDR data mode , all ready for = 8Khz tested to -50 dB as bench mark : )=20 From: Stefan Sch=E4fer=20 Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 1:57 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: Re: LF: Experimental software for WSPR-8 and -32 Hi all,=20 Hmmm, theoretically we can generate every WSPR speed now. Markus, = should we try a WSPR-256 on VLF/ 8970 Hz? :-) I still have the big coil = in the cellar and the band looks fine :-) Remember the "old" times... = http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber.html 73, Stefan/DK7FC ------=_NextPart_000_0099_01CD990C.D8136760 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Stefan
 
If you  can  generate  the signal  of = your =20 previous  tests , I don't  think  the  range =20 will  be that  short  !!
 
Due to the  long  tx pulses  of  OP4 Hr  , = the  signal  will  also  show  on spec-lab , = so =20 test  data  is not  lost  , if  decode  = fails=20 .
 
The  software  produces  the  8K audio  = tone =20 via  the  sound  card and has the com-port  = on/off =20 keying  output as well  ,  normal  sound cards  = are  suitable  , the  software inputs  = directly =20 at  8K  using  sound  card  as  SDR
 
If you  have a  target  date ,  I can  = post =20 in the  Op  group  for  monitor's
 
73-G.

From: Stefan = Sch=E4fer
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 7:14 PM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= =20
Subject: Re: LF: Experimental software for WSPR-8 and=20 -32

I'll give it a try Graham. The problem may be to find = monitoring=20 stations in a short range...

73, Stefan

Am 22.09.2012 = 17:20,=20 schrieb Graham:=20
And of course  there  is a  =20 240  SDR  data    mode  , = all =20 ready  for  8Khz  tested  to  -50 dB  as = bench=20 mark   : )

From: Stefan Sch=E4fer
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 1:57 PM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: Experimental software for WSPR-8 and=20 -32

Hi all,

Hmmm, theoretically we can generate = every WSPR=20 speed now. Markus, should we try a WSPR-256 on VLF/ 8970 Hz? :-) I = still have=20 the big coil in the cellar and the band looks fine :-)
Remember the = "old"=20 times... http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK= 7FC_VLF_Grabber.html

73,=20 Stefan/DK7FC
------=_NextPart_000_0099_01CD990C.D8136760--