Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mh01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id D07C33800009B; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 12:36:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1T9IZp-0002KO-24 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 17:35:41 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1T9IZo-0002KF-Lf for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 17:35:40 +0100 Received: from smtpout5.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.80] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1T9IZn-00088U-1Q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 17:35:39 +0100 Received: from AGB ([2.26.47.212]) by mwinf5d61 with ME id vUbe1j00A4agp4203Ubea9; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 18:35:38 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Graham" To: References: <5046503B.3050904@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <836728322-1346785992-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-2129170870-@b17.c17.bise6.blackberry> <50465556.5000909@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5046872C.90307@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <50476D85.7040909@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <504771F5.5060703@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 17:35:38 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: No decodes Stefan... Looking on the psk map , the path to M0LMH , could be sea until HULL , where as I have about 240 miles of Land , makes a big difference GW on 500 , similarly I have 559 signals from Ireland over the sea to my west in daytime [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.80 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: 739d4fb39bd02fc5a2de5437a39bb056 Subject: Re: LF: MF acty Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60d550477f954095 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none No decodes Stefan... Looking on the psk map , the path to M0LMH , could be sea until HULL , where as I have about 240 miles of Land , makes a big difference GW on 500 , similarly I have 559 signals from Ireland over the sea to my west in daytime G. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Graham" Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 5:25 PM To: Subject: Re: LF: MF acty > DK7FC de SWL-M0LMH (England): Op4 536 mi -26 dB in Harrogate > > or 4 dB over :) > > G. > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Stefan Schäfer" > Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 4:38 PM > To: > Subject: Re: LF: MF acty > >> >> Am 05.09.2012 17:19, schrieb Stefan Schäfer: >>> [...]but as soon as the sunrise comes, no signals are detected in the UK >>> while the levels are 25 dB above the decode limit in the night. >> Ehm, no, i've concentrated to much on the plot of G0KTN while writing >> that. M0LMH even get's daytime decodes on the lower limit, maybe having a >> somehow better RX-system+location(?)... >> >> 73, Stefan >> >