Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dk03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id BBA3B380000A6; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:24:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TE0aV-0007WZ-Lq for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:23:51 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TE0aV-0007WQ-4V for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:23:51 +0100 Received: from smtplq-out12.aruba.it ([62.149.158.32] helo=smtplq02.aruba.it) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TE0aT-0003pS-Fm for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:23:50 +0100 Received: (qmail 30208 invoked by uid 89); 18 Sep 2012 16:23:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp5.aruba.it) (62.149.158.225) by smtplq02.aruba.it with SMTP; 18 Sep 2012 16:23:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 3022 invoked by uid 89); 18 Sep 2012 16:23:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mauro.stmb.it) (ik1wvq@stmb.it@80.117.110.1) by smtp5.ad.aruba.it with SMTP; 18 Sep 2012 16:23:47 -0000 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 18:23:45 +0200 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: IK1WVQ Mauro In-Reply-To: <50589124.1040508@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> References: <50589124.1040508@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Rating: smtp5.ad.aruba.it 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: smtplq02.aruba.it 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 62.149.158.32 (smtplq-out12.aruba.it) used invalid HELO/EHLO smtplq02.aruba.it - verification failed X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan, what DIAL frequency must be set in RX for receive your WSPR packets ??? 73 de Mauro Ik1WVQ At 17.20 18/09/12, Stefan Schäfer wrote: [...] Content analysis details: (0.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.149.158.32 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.1 MISSING_MID Missing Message-Id: header X-Scan-Signature: 4ead635eadbaebfaa92cfec77deb715d Message-Id: Subject: Re: LF: WSPR tests by DK7FC Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1db4075058a05b003b X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Stefan, what DIAL frequency must be set in RX for receive your WSPR packets ??? 73 de Mauro Ik1WVQ At 17.20 18/09/12, Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote: >So now i joined the WSPR group and start to do=20 >some test transmissions with the normal 2 minute=20 >WSPR code, using Markus' tool. The goal is to=20 >see if the tool works properly and what decode=20 >levels i can obtain in various distances. > >A 2 minute WSPR beacon is running here in=20 >Heidelberg / JN49IK, 50% TX time. I will run it until tomorrow 6 UTC. > >Reports apprechiated :-)