Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 13B5338000084; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 13:01:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TA1v7-0003kb-QJ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:00:41 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TA1v7-0003kS-Cd for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:00:41 +0100 Received: from mta41.charter.net ([216.33.127.83]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TA1v5-0001R8-AN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:00:40 +0100 Received: from imp11 ([10.20.200.11]) by mta41.charter.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.02 201-2260-151-103-20110920) with ESMTP id <20120907170036.JUTU10143.mta41.charter.net@imp11> for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 13:00:36 -0400 Received: from [192.168.2.101] ([74.94.151.157]) by imp11 with smtp.charter.net id wH0b1j00J3Q0UcS05H0c3r; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 13:00:36 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=Mv9Cy8NsQItTEAHnXr6fCNbI23lcrkmyMeqLv9HU3yU= c=1 sm=1 a=yUnIBFQkZM0A:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=ejtJoL0ZZT7mxq6cVE868A==:17 a=pSDxxfrZAAAA:8 a=F3M5lZpKAAAA:8 a=Gzy7qtdh9l4Wpe8RoKUA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=wk6s2zzMB60A:10 a=ejtJoL0ZZT7mxq6cVE868A==:117 X-Auth-id: dzF0YWdAY2hhcnRlci5uZXQ= References: <50493001.4050202@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <16BEB82EDFAD4E4FB0A34C8BABAA6AE1@AGB> From: John Andrews X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8E501) In-Reply-To: <16BEB82EDFAD4E4FB0A34C8BABAA6AE1@AGB> Message-Id: Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 13:00:33 -0400 To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8E501) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Graham, I'm assuming that you're just kidding. The paths to Moscow are shorter, at higher latitude, and generally don't include the thunderstorm levels we have in the eastern U.S. John, W1TAG [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [216.33.127.83 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: a6b6ffaf48fdddf1ed5c25dc4bf03ee1 Subject: Re: LF: LF/MF night and weekend Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600e504a28830d1e X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Graham, I'm assuming that you're just kidding. The paths to Moscow are shorter, at h= igher latitude, and generally don't include the thunderstorm levels we have i= n the eastern U.S.=20 John, W1TAG On Sep 7, 2012, at 8:19 AM, "Graham" wrote: > First demonstration that what go's East , not always go's West != >=20 > Spectacular s/n levels in the Moscow area but nothing showing > TA ? >=20 > G.. >=20 >=20 > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer" > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 12:21 AM > To: > Subject: LF: LF/MF night and weekend >=20 >> Hello group, >>=20 >> Wow, there is really much activity on the band tonite! >> I'm back in Heidelberg, now transmitting OP32 on 137.515kHz during repair= ing the MF PA. Later i'll switch back to 477 kHz, depending on what's going o= n on 137. But at least tomorrow i will run OP4 on 477 again until late sunda= y, i.e. more than 24 hours. >>=20 >> It would be nice to get some 24 hour data from different stations and loc= ations to make a S/N plot showing various propagation phenomena over land an= d sea. Perhaps saturday 0:00...23:59:59 UTC is a good idea? Suggestions? >>=20 >> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >=20