Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 2EE9A380000B3; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 16:12:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TEn5Z-0002e8-IQ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 21:11:09 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TEn5X-0002dz-H9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 21:11:07 +0100 Received: from mail-bk0-f43.google.com ([209.85.214.43]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TEn5V-0007Yw-89 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 21:11:06 +0100 Received: by bkty15 with SMTP id y15so2006183bkt.16 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:11:04 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ZVURS8Z5RWjqfFflHJVo1nLcbI2jyNMtCuYeXmzraSk=; b=bXE7GPQfW5jDQbhsftfACpuAROs+pNXFGjBkGxmmmW6AgEBMjc/mxdeA+eo6JatvC8 1+0at8g+DApof8VbZ5lBMGC4R2Uatr9x/GSNYAosEf/IVgoqnYF9TZtFIlKknIn0t4Bj 0YorjJwWxlR9wn3Kczo2rV0kZl6IAcqGvT66/YKsx3OY4i9CKr266TJP42cBVke67vUX qWojh3Hn+EamoYz/PVKeyUVexSxCkFfV6qEx15sx3QzWKuKAbGZrrjY8dM433EvZ996f 2V6OumfshCUn0+WMIZWzUb7MXmdCOtAgidoFz/65WwzTpzHxPuG/8ut9mtoND1iDYEnw 67Xw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.152.220 with SMTP id h28mr1252928bkw.30.1348171864080; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:11:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.170.136 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:11:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 21:11:04 +0100 Message-ID: From: Roger Lapthorn To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: This evening, my WSPR tests are with the latest version of my homebrew transverter, designed to be used with QRP rigs like the FT817 in "split" mode. The transmitter operates around 3.7MHz and transverts down to either 472 or 500kHz. On RX, the transverter simply passes the RX signal through to the FT817 which is used on 472/500kHz. This makes for a very simple yet effective design. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.214.43 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rogerlapthorn[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 1e15d6d6179985f133b43d42d658878a Subject: LF: 472/500kHz 10W transverter Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cd17e0dffa304ca27b9b7 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-de03.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40cb505b78924953 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --0015175cd17e0dffa304ca27b9b7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 This evening, my WSPR tests are with the latest version of my homebrew transverter, designed to be used with QRP rigs like the FT817 in "split" mode. The transmitter operates around 3.7MHz and transverts down to either 472 or 500kHz. On RX, the transverter simply passes the RX signal through to the FT817 which is used on 472/500kHz. This makes for a very simple yet effective design. I reverted to a double balanced mixer (SBL1 or ADE-1 or similar) for the TX mixer and this has made the design very stable and reliable now. The PA and ATU coils are air wound in the GW3UEP style on 22mm PVC pipe. The whole unit fits in a small plastic box. Already WSPR reports are coming through from PA, G, GW despite the use of my short vertical tuned against a copper water tank ground and resonated with a tapped coil on a ferrite rod. Signal levels from some suggest CW QSOs should be OK. Details of the transverter are available on my website and on my blog at < http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/472500khz-transverter-finished.html >. I hope this little circuit encourages a few newcomers to try the new band in due course. For now tests continue on 500kHz and further reports would be much appreciated. 73s Roger G3XBM -- http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ http://www.g3xbm.co.uk https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/ http://qss2.blogspot.com/ --0015175cd17e0dffa304ca27b9b7 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This evening, my WSPR tests are with the latest version of my homebrew tran= sverter, designed to be used with QRP rigs like the FT817 in "split&qu= ot; mode. The transmitter operates around 3.7MHz and transverts down to eit= her 472 or 500kHz. On RX, the transverter simply passes the RX signal throu= gh to the FT817 which is used on 472/500kHz. This makes for a very simple y= et effective design.

I reverted to a double balanced mixer (SBL1 or ADE-1 or similar) for th= e TX mixer and this has made the design very stable and reliable now. The P= A and ATU coils are air wound in the GW3UEP style on 22mm PVC pipe. The who= le unit fits in a small plastic box.

Already WSPR reports are coming through from PA, G, GW despite the use = of my short vertical tuned against a copper water tank ground and resonated= with a tapped coil on a ferrite rod. Signal levels from some suggest CW QS= Os should be OK.

Details of the transverter are available on my website and on my blog a= t <http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/472500khz-transv= erter-finished.html>.

I hope this little circuit encourages a few newcomers to try the new ba= nd in due course. For now tests continue on 500kHz and further reports woul= d be much appreciated.

73s
Roger G3XBM

-- http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
https://sites.google.com/sit= e/sub9khz/
http://qss2.blogspot.com/

=
--0015175cd17e0dffa304ca27b9b7--