Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id CFFFF3800009F; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 20:19:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TBaf6-0003Kt-7K for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 01:18:36 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TBaf5-0003Kk-Jy for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 01:18:35 +0100 Received: from blu0-omc1-s5.blu0.hotmail.com ([65.55.116.16]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TBaf3-0000Od-AW for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 01:18:34 +0100 Received: from BLU153-W36 ([65.55.116.8]) by blu0-omc1-s5.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:18:29 -0700 Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: [136.226.254.42] From: Laurence KL7UK To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:18:29 -0800 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <504FC775.7090808@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> References: <504FAA9D.2040900@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <504FAEEA.4070903@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <598897811E394AC49AC2660FDD942CB3@AGB> <504FB76C.1030400@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> ,<504FC775.7090808@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Sep 2012 00:18:29.0379 (UTC) FILETIME=[228F8D30:01CD907C] X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan - On average at BY3A (110 miles East of Bejing near Tinjin) and 9V1LF Singapore HGA22 was 7-10dB stronger than DCF39. WHich to my mind is a little more than could be expected by just a 480 Kms few hundred Kms path length difference. I was using the SDR IQ so pretty confident about the dbs... The path to Singapore from Eu was pretty good on a day to day basis and much less affected by, as you say, the more Northern Oval approaching route to NE China. It doesnt need much of a Northerly track to hit a lot of path attenuation very quickly when the Oval decends to more temperate latitudes. Its worse sometimes for the Transpolar to here where Gt Circle/Rhum paths that have to cross and track along/under/over the Oval twice - once your side and again once it gets over here...and I have a couple of local mountain ranges which upset things slightly.. Cheers Laurence (seems to be my day for emails) KL1X Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 01:21:25 +0200 From: Re: LF: UA0SNV [...] Content analysis details: (-0.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [65.55.116.16 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (hellozerohellozero[at]hotmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.3 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 420019f4991fbaa4f653703c21f48617 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_db83c665-a17c-49ed-b089-6af80a487951_" Subject: LF: HGA 22 v DCF39 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD, HTML_MESSAGE,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408f504fd50d0a7f X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --_db83c665-a17c-49ed-b089-6af80a487951_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Stefan - On average at BY3A (110 miles East of Bejing near Tinjin) and 9V1L= F Singapore HGA22 was 7-10dB stronger than DCF39. WHich to my mind is a lit= tle more than could be expected by just a 480 Kms few hundred Kms path leng= th difference. I was using the SDR IQ so pretty confident about the dbs... = The path to Singapore from Eu was pretty good on a day to day basis and muc= h less affected by=2C as you say=2C the more Northern Oval approaching rout= e to NE China. It doesnt need much of a Northerly track to hit a lot of pat= h attenuation very quickly when the Oval decends to more temperate latitude= s. Its worse sometimes for the Transpolar to here where Gt Circle/Rhum path= s that have to cross and track along/under/over the Oval twice - once your = side and again once it gets over here...and I have a couple of local mounta= in ranges which upset things slightly.. Cheers Laurence (seems to be my day= for emails) KL1X Date: Wed=2C 12 Sep 2012 01:21:25 +0200 From: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org CC: ja8scd@kt.rim.or.jp Subject: Re: LF: UA0SNV =20 Am 12.09.2012 00:50=2C schrieb Graham: =20 =20 Interesting =20 JA =2C only a few more CM on the map :- ) =20 =20 Another important factor (!): The path to Japan goes much higher and closer to the auroral oval than the path to UA0. So the dependency on solar activity is much higher. In tests with JA8SCD who runs his grabber showing a daily DCF plot=2C this was daily confirmed. The SNR of HGA22 was much loss affected by solar activity that the DCF39 SNR. http://icas.to/argo/eu.htm BTW the path to Japan starts to open. Worth to try=2C but not in OP32 for now... 73=2C Stefan/DK7FC = --_db83c665-a17c-49ed-b089-6af80a487951_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Stefan - On average at BY3A (110 miles East of Bejing near Tinjin) and 9V1L= F Singapore HGA22 was 7-10dB stronger than DCF39. WHich to my mind is a lit= tle more than could be expected by just a 480 Kms =3Bfew hundred Kms pa= th length =3Bdifference. I was using the SDR IQ so pretty confident abo= ut the dbs...
 =3B
The path to Singapore from Eu was pretty = =3Bgood on a day to day basis and much less affected =3Bby=2C as you sa= y=2C the more Northern Oval approaching route to NE China.
 =3B
I= t doesnt need much of a Northerly track to hit a lot of =3Bpath attenua= tion very quickly =3Bwhen the Oval =3Bdecends to =3Bmore temper= ate latitudes. Its worse sometimes =3Bfor the Transpolar to here where = Gt Circle/Rhum paths that have to cross and track =3Balong/under/over t= he Oval twice - once your side and again once it gets over here...and I hav= e a couple of local mountain ranges which upset things slightly..
 = =3B
Cheers Laurence (seems to be my day for emails) KL1X
 =3B
=

Date: We= d=2C 12 Sep 2012 01:21:25 +0200
From: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg= .de
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
CC: ja8scd@kt.rim.or.jp
Subje= ct: Re: LF: UA0SNV

=20
Am 12.09.2012 00:50=2C schrieb Graham:
=20 =20
Interesting
 =3B
JA =2C only =3B a =3B few =3B more =3B CM =3B on= the =3B map =3B :- )


Another important factor (!): The path to Japan goes much higher and closer to the auroral oval than the path to UA0. So the dependency on solar activity is much higher. In tests with JA8SCD who runs his grabber showing a daily DCF plot=2C this was daily confirmed. The SNR of HGA22 was much loss affected by solar activity that the DCF39 SNR.

http://icas.to/argo/eu.htm

BTW the path to Japan starts to open. Worth to try=2C but not in OP32 for now...

73=2C Stefan/DK7FC
= --_db83c665-a17c-49ed-b089-6af80a487951_--