Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id DF66F38001757; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:49:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TGuup-0007hx-6P for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:56:51 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TGuuo-0007ho-Or for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:56:50 +0100 Received: from smtpout2.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.42] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TGuum-0002Hb-B1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:56:49 +0100 Received: from AGB ([2.26.21.22]) by mwinf5d28 with ME id 3swk1k00P0UbBaS03swkWD; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 18:56:47 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Graham" To: References: <821800BC63854E00A15D64600A70503A@AGB> In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:56:43 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks Chris Odd last night , the signal was quite low , peaked , dropped and finally reached normal levels later in the night , when I first set the Rx to 136, it seemed there was a problem .. 73 -G.. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.42 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 42bbe44aa18353e845a65753486d556c Subject: Re: LF: dfc39 on low power ?? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_005A_01CD9C10.4A5756A0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_MESSAGE,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408250635c5d18ce X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_005A_01CD9C10.4A5756A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks Chris=20 Odd last night , the signal was quite low , peaked , dropped and = finally reached normal levels later in the night , when I first = set the Rx to 136, it seemed there was a problem .. =20 73 -G.. From: Chris 4X1RF=20 Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 7:41 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: Re: LF: dfc39 on low power ?? Hi Graham, Nothing out of the ordinary noticed as shown on the HGA22 / DCF39 plot = on the bottom page of the Bucharest grabber: = http://qsl.net/4x1rf/yo/lfgrabber.htm 73s Chris 4X1RF On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Graham wrote: Is dfc39 on low power ? not much of a signal ? or has my system filled up with water ? 48 hours of rain so far = G. ------=_NextPart_000_005A_01CD9C10.4A5756A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks Chris
 
Odd  last night  , the  signal  was  quite = low ,=20 peaked , dropped and  finally  reached  normal  = levels later=20 in the  night  , when I first  set the  Rx to  = 136,=20 it  seemed  there  was  a problem .. 
 
73 -G..

Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: LF: dfc39 on low power ??

Hi Graham,

Nothing out of the ordinary noticed as shown on the HGA22 / DCF39 = plot on=20 the bottom page of the Bucharest grabber: http://qsl.net/4x1rf/yo/lf= grabber.htm

73s
Chris 4X1RF


On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Graham <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
Is dfc39   on low power  ? not  much of = a =20 signal  ?
 
or  has my   system  filled up with  = water =20 ? 48 hours of rain so  far
 
=
G.

------=_NextPart_000_005A_01CD9C10.4A5756A0--