Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-me02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id A960A380000D4; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 17:31:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TDitV-0005sB-NT for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 22:30:17 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TDitV-0005s2-4b for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 22:30:17 +0100 Received: from smtpout5.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.80] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TDitS-0000JL-W2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 22:30:16 +0100 Received: from AGB ([2.27.189.53]) by mwinf5d65 with ME id 0MWE1k00W19a0Tm03MWEQl; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 23:30:14 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Graham" To: References: <50565D34.3070603@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <505765C1.6050300@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5057860F.7020509@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <50578CE9.5060002@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <50578CE9.5060002@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 22:30:14 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Excellent coverage Stefan, can see other stations also reliably decoding over range as well ! condx improving by the day/week ? No monitors in VK though , showing on the map ? are your op32 signals showing on the grabber plots there ? [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.80 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: bde53fa3678f346afe39dd99e3e185db Subject: Re: LF: OP32 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-15"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d608a505796bb7176 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Excellent coverage Stefan, can see other stations also reliably decoding over range as well ! condx improving by the day/week ? No monitors in VK though , showing on the map ? are your op32 signals showing on the grabber plots there ? G. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Stefan Schäfer" Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 9:49 PM To: Subject: Re: LF: OP32 > This one at least yes: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/UA0SNV.png > > 73, Stefan > > Am 17.09.2012 22:45, schrieb Graham: >> That's over OP8 decode levels ? >> >> -------------------------------------------------- >> From: "Stefan Schäfer" >> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 9:20 PM >> To: >> Subject: Re: LF: OP32 >> >>> 8! >>> >>> 18:59 136 DK7FC de UA0SNV-1 Op32 5739 km -33 dB in Ust-Ilimsk >>> >>> 73, Stefan >>> >>> Am 17.09.2012 22:13, schrieb Graham: >>>> 7 dB over the s/n floor :) >>>> >>>> >>>> Monitor: UA0SNV-1 Loc OO17HX >>>> Frequency: 0.136 MHz (2200m) >>>> Using: Opera v1.4.4/Rptr V1.6 >>>> >>>> Antenna: Op32_||||||||_~34dB >>>> >>>> Show all seen by UA0SNV-1 >>>> Last report: DK7FC >>>> at Mon, 17 Sep 2012 20:04:53 GMT >>>> >>>> -------------------------------------------------- >>>> From: "Stefan Schäfer" >>>> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 7:02 PM >>>> To: >>>> Subject: Re: LF: OP32 >>>> >>>>> G.., >>>>> >>>>> Am 17.09.2012 14:24, schrieb Graham: >>>>>> Stefan, >>>>>> >>>>>> I find the s/n of the two longest paths , being similar , >>>>>> interesting as one is sea water and the other over land .. >>>>>> had assume the sea path would be many dB better ? >>>>> From the SNR you don't get any informations about the local QRN >>>>> situation. It may have been very quiet on the path to UA0 and there >>>>> may have been many thunderstorms close to W1. W1 is much closer to the >>>>> equator so it is more likely that Jay has to fight with some >>>>> lightnings on that path... >>>>> >>>>> 73, Stefan >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> unless there is still some form of masking on the TA path ? >>>>>> >>>>>> 73 -G.. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> From: "Stefan Schäfer" >>>>>> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 12:13 AM >>>>>> To: >>>>>> Subject: LF: OP32 >>>>>> >>>>>>> LF, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks to the recent overnight monitoring stations. Here is my >>>>>>> summary >>>>>>> for the last 2 days. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >>>>>>> >>>>> >>> >