Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-df06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 9E28F380000B7; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 17:51:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TASv1-0001Zq-To for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 22:50:23 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TASv1-0001Zh-Fq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 22:50:23 +0100 Received: from smtpa1.mediabeam.com ([194.25.41.13]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TASuz-0006bj-MA for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 22:50:22 +0100 Received: from IMAP4 (balancer7.mediabeam.com [10.100.1.80]) by smtpa1.mediabeam.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q88LoKfe023347 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 23:50:20 +0200 Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2012 23:50:18 +0200 From: uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-ID: <720af6c3ac664f96878210d2d4ae122e@kabelmail.de> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Klaus, thanks for the report. just had a qso with DK0SWF. he gave 445, I rcvd him 599 plus. GL Uwe/dj8wx Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Gesendet: 08.09.2012 17:35 An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Betreff: Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: DK0SWF antenna [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [194.25.41.13 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 79aab7440207271f32757adc503f8c76 Subject: Re: Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: DK0SWF antenna Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----92EC79654DAB4BB59888A5AC1AF746B3" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_REAL_NAME, PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40da504bbdcd0fac X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none ------92EC79654DAB4BB59888A5AC1AF746B3 Content-type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Klaus, thanks for the report=2E just had a qso with DK0SWF=2E he gave 445, I rcvd him 599 plus=2E GL Uwe/dj8wx Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg Gesendet: 08=2E09=2E2012 17:35 An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg Betreff: Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: DK0SWF antenna Geri, Mal & Group=20 Mal, don't be so harsh with them=2E These guys are obviously new to MF = and they have a real problem handling a big vertical (ex BC stn "SWF")=2E= I had a qso with the guy on 80m and he told me they have QRM > S9=2E A= big vertical is definitely a good tx-antenna but for rx it is a comple= tely different story as you surely know=2E=20 But Mal you are right they caused a bit of a havoc not beeing able to r= eceive=2E But as Geri said: a one night =2E=2E=2E=20 Geri maybe you can relay my SWL report to them:=20 DK0SWF=A0was 599 in the beginning, later (21:00UTC) 579=A0=20 I also received:=20 OM1II 559=20 DF0WD 579=20 DJ8WX 56/79=20 DJ2LF 59+9 ((only 11km!)=20 Sri Mal, I could not receive you=20 RX: Flex5000, Ant: bandpass loop as per M0BMU in Garden app 4m agl=20 73=20 de Klaus=20 DJ6LB=20 JN59mm ------92EC79654DAB4BB59888A5AC1AF746B3 Content-type: text/html; charset=Windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Klaus,

thanks for the report=2E
just had a qso with DK0SWF=2E he gave 445, I rcvd him 599 plus=2E

GL
Uwe/dj8wx
Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg
Gesendet: 08=2E09=2E2012 17:35
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg
Betreff: Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: DK0SWF antenna

Geri, Mal & Group
Mal, don't be so harsh with them=2E These guys are obviously new t= o MF and they have a real problem handling a big vertical (ex BC stn "SWF")=2E I= had a qso with the guy on 80m and he told me they have QRM > S9=2E A big verti= cal is definitely a good tx-antenna but for rx it is a completely different st= ory as you surely know=2E
But Mal you are right they caused a bit of a havoc not beeing able= to receive=2E But as Geri said: a one night =2E=2E=2E
Geri maybe you can relay my SWL report to them:
DK0SWF was 599 in the beginning, later (21:00UTC) 579 
I also received:
OM1II 559
DF0WD 579
DJ8WX 56/79
DJ2LF 59+9 ((only 11km!)
Sri Mal, I could not receive you
RX: Flex5000, Ant: bandpass loop as per M0BMU in Garden app 4m agl=
 
73
de Klaus
DJ6LB
JN59mm
------92EC79654DAB4BB59888A5AC1AF746B3--