Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-me01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B7B2C3800008F; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:55:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1THCfw-0003A7-LQ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 12:54:40 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1THCfw-00039y-5w for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 12:54:40 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1THCfu-0006Cb-Dd for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 12:54:39 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q8RBsa15021209 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:54:37 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q8RBsZlx011272 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:54:35 +0200 Message-ID: <50643E76.4050505@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:54:30 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <50622345.8030407@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <50624346.9020800@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <50631D98.1030607@broadpark.no> <50631F39.8040109@broadpark.no> <50632103.5090304@broadpark.no> <506332F4.3040104@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <506387BC.70004@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <476111504.20120927092419@mterrier.net> In-Reply-To: <476111504.20120927092419@mterrier.net> X-Spam-Score: -3.1 (---) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Michel, Thanks for the first report. Yes, the SNR is usually very good between us. It was to show that it works. I was amazed by the low noise levels at YV7MAE so i couldn't withstand to try in WSPR-32. This is why a changed this mode. Maybe some monitoring stations already went to bed to this time so the PC was running in 8 over the night. Sorry for that. [...] Content analysis details: (-3.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.8 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: f64a6c8ea7591cecbecc6db95ffdd328 Subject: Re: LF: WSPR-8 in the early night. Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070202080308040409000906" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d608950643eb47bda X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070202080308040409000906 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Michel, Thanks for the first report. Yes, the SNR is usually very good between us. It was to show that it works. I was amazed by the low noise levels at YV7MAE so i couldn't withstand to try in WSPR-32. This is why a changed this mode. Maybe some monitoring stations already went to bed to this time so the PC was running in 8 over the night. Sorry for that. There will be many more chances i can promise :-) It was crazy, i was transmitting WSPR-32 at 100% TX time, i.e. there were about 20 seconds each hour where the PA was off, almost a key down transmission for 6 hours. Seems to be a proof for this PA system :-) Today i have a sked with UA0SNV who set up to WSPR-32. So i will start at *17 UTC* in 32! 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 27.09.2012 09:24, schrieb Michel Brunel: > Hi Stefan, > > Strong signal here as usual, but only two decodes until I switched off. > We do not agree with the start time and this was expected ;) I choose to > start with the existing wspr de facto standard. > The displayed frequencies are not correct, and this was expected too. > > WSPR-32 will not be available until I add a low pass filter before the > required decimation process. So, plenty of improvements to do. > > Anyway, I'm pleased with this first on air decode in wspr-8 > > Thanks Stefan for your transmissions. > > 73, Michel - f5wk --------------070202080308040409000906 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Michel,

Thanks for the first report. Yes, the SNR is usually very good between us. It was to show that it works.

I was amazed by the low noise levels at YV7MAE so i couldn't withstand to try in WSPR-32. This is why a changed this mode. Maybe some monitoring stations already went to bed to this time so the PC was running in 8 over the night. Sorry for that.

There will be many more chances i can promise :-)

It was crazy, i was transmitting WSPR-32 at 100% TX time, i.e. there were about 20 seconds each hour where the PA was off, almost a key down transmission for 6 hours. Seems to be a proof for this PA system :-)

Today i have a sked with UA0SNV who set up to WSPR-32. So i will start at 17 UTC in 32!

73, Stefan/DK7FC


Am 27.09.2012 09:24, schrieb Michel Brunel:
Re: LF: WSPR-8 in the early night. Hi Stefan,

Strong signal here as usual, but only two decodes until I switched off.
We do not agree with the start time and this was expected ;) I choose to
start with the existing wspr de facto standard.
The displayed frequencies are not correct, and this was expected too.

WSPR-32 will not be available until I add a low pass filter before the
required decimation process. So, plenty of improvements to do.

Anyway, I'm pleased with this first on air decode in wspr-8 

Thanks Stefan for your transmissions.

73, Michel - f5wk
--------------070202080308040409000906--