Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mb01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 92FC83800008C; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 13:42:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TGCJb-0007AB-G8 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:19:27 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.34] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TGCJa-0007A2-Ox for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:19:26 +0100 Received: from mout3.freenet.de ([195.4.92.93]) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtps (UNKNOWN:AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TGCJY-0007yn-Hr for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:19:25 +0100 Received: from [195.4.92.140] (helo=mjail0.freenet.de) by mout3.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1TGCJW-0005su-VV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 19:19:22 +0200 Received: from localhost ([::1]:49499 helo=mjail0.freenet.de) by mjail0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1TGCJW-0003IP-Rc for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 19:19:22 +0200 Received: from [195.4.92.10] (port=45655 helo=0.mx.freenet.de) by mjail0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1TGCGy-0002Km-Hn for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 19:16:44 +0200 Received: from blfd-d9bf6179.pool.mediaways.net ([217.191.97.121]:2461 helo=[192.168.178.22]) by 0.mx.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (port 465) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1TGCGy-00083v-7W for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 19:16:44 +0200 Message-ID: <5060957A.7030105@freenet.de> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 19:16:42 +0200 From: wolf_dl4yhf User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <505F63DF.60102@freenet.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay2.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Lubos and all, Thanks for checking - so we can be sure this is not a receiver problem on any side. Your signal is much stronger than this QRM most of the evening, but in some occasions it's irritating to hear a tone at the QSO partner's frequency - especially when there was QSB and one cannot be sure if the over is really 'over'. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [195.4.92.93 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dl4yhf[at]freenet.de) -0.8 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 87525734ac0bb319fb3f44295fe6963b Subject: Re: LF: Weak 'nighttime' carrier on 472.5 kHz ? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090601000907040205080204" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d601550609b9e3adb X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090601000907040205080204 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Lubos and all, Thanks for checking - so we can be sure this is not a receiver problem on any side. Your signal is much stronger than this QRM most of the evening, but in some occasions it's irritating to hear a tone at the QSO partner's frequency - especially when there was QSB and one cannot be sure if the over is really 'over'. I will check 472.000 and 471.692 kHz too, but at the moment the WX is not good (in fact, it's "lousy") for any activities at the club station. We had temperatures just above 0°C here last weekend, and +17°C with lots of rain now. Oh btw, Finbar EI0CF seems to be back on MF, listening on 472.x kHz in late evenings. IIRC, he usually transmitted around 501 kHz during our last QSOs so it may be worth listening for a reply around that frequency, and announce this in own CQ calls. All the best, Wolf . Am 24.09.2012 06:58, schrieb Lubos OK2BVG: > Hello Wolf, group! > Yes, I can see the signal as well. Similar signals are on 472,000 and > 471,692kHz. I think, the are from distant TXs, but I donīt know their > ID. I can see the signals on both my receiving stations, they are 2km > distant each to other. > If the conditions are very well, I can see and listen to a second harm > from NDB "SA" on 472,460kHz (474,500-(2x1,020)). But it donīt disturbe > me, becouse it is only a poor signal, of course. > 73! > > Lubos, OK2BVG > > ******************************************* > > > Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 21:32:47 +0200 > > From: dl4yhf@freenet.de > > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk > > Subject: LF: Weak 'nighttime' carrier on 472.5 kHz ? > > > > Dear group, > > Do others hear (or see) a continous carrier on 472.5 kHz as well ? > > I first thought it was 'local' but since it's only there in the > > nighttime, and even suffers from QSB like the 'wanted' signals it must > > be from a distant transmitter. Don't think it's an intermod product in > > the receiver, because the signal is audible with an SDR-IQ and a > Perseus > > as well - not just with the old IC706 which I use at DF0WD for > reception > > on MF. > > > > If this frequency is audible / visible in other parts of Europe as > well, > > we may have to move the de-facto CW 'calling frequency' a bit... maybe > > by 50 Hz or so which makes it easy to tell an answering call from this > > carrier signal (which sometimes sounds like Morse but in a spectrogram > > one can see that it never disappears 'completely'). > > > > 73, > > Wolf DL4YHF / DF0WD > > JO42FD . > > > > --------------090601000907040205080204 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hi Lubos and all,

Thanks for checking - so we can be sure this is not a receiver problem on any side.
Your signal is much stronger than this QRM most of the evening, but in some occasions it's irritating to hear a tone at the QSO partner's frequency - especially when there was QSB and one cannot be sure if the over is really 'over'.

I will check 472.000 and 471.692 kHz too, but at the moment the WX is not good (in fact, it's "lousy") for any activities at the club station. We had temperatures just above 0°C here last weekend, and +17°C with lots of rain now.

Oh btw, Finbar EI0CF seems to be back on MF, listening on 472.x kHz in late evenings. IIRC, he usually transmitted around 501 kHz during our last QSOs so it may be worth listening for a reply around that frequency, and announce this in own CQ calls.

All the best,
   Wolf .

Am 24.09.2012 06:58, schrieb Lubos OK2BVG:
Hello Wolf, group!
Yes, I can see the signal as well. Similar signals are on 472,000 and 471,692kHz. I think, the are from distant TXs, but I donīt know their ID. I can see the signals on both my receiving stations, they are 2km distant  each to other. 
If the conditions are very well, I can see and listen to a second harm from NDB "SA" on 472,460kHz (474,500-(2x1,020)). But it donīt disturbe me, becouse it is only a poor signal, of course.   
73!

Lubos, OK2BVG

*******************************************

> Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 21:32:47 +0200
> From: dl4yhf@freenet.de
> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk
> Subject: LF: Weak 'nighttime' carrier on 472.5 kHz ?
>
> Dear group,
> Do others hear (or see) a continous carrier on 472.5 kHz as well ?
> I first thought it was 'local' but since it's only there in the
> nighttime, and even suffers from QSB like the 'wanted' signals it must
> be from a distant transmitter. Don't think it's an intermod product in
> the receiver, because the signal is audible with an SDR-IQ and a Perseus
> as well - not just with the old IC706 which I use at DF0WD for reception
> on MF.
>
> If this frequency is audible / visible in other parts of Europe as well,
> we may have to move the de-facto CW 'calling frequency' a bit... maybe
> by 50 Hz or so which makes it easy to tell an answering call from this
> carrier signal (which sometimes sounds like Morse but in a spectrogram
> one can see that it never disappears 'completely').
>
> 73,
> Wolf DL4YHF / DF0WD
> JO42FD .
>
>

--------------090601000907040205080204--