Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 9DF7A38000085; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 20:25:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TFZzx-0006L4-D2 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 01:24:37 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TFZzw-0006Km-6v for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 01:24:36 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TFZzt-0001Cz-Ma for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 01:24:34 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q8N0OXk6016409 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 02:24:33 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q8N0OXsj026481 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 02:24:33 +0200 Message-ID: <505E55F3.8020502@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 02:21:07 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?U3RlZmFuIFNjaMOkZmVy?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <7F2208077DA448F78F384AF5B55DECA0@White> <505DD1D8.70901@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <829FB31FADAD4D4682EC509D2416C9F4@AGB> <005d01cd98fe$74bc6030$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <0865DC8F-C867-4D80-8149-D2474B51ED63@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <0865DC8F-C867-4D80-8149-D2474B51ED63@gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Jay, Thank you once again! Congrats to your equipment! Timestamp Call MHz SNR Drift Grid Pwr Reporter RGrid km az 2012-09-23 00:08 DK7FC 0.136164 -27 0 JN49ik 1 W1VD FN31ls 6099 295 2012-09-22 23:48 DK7FC 0.136223 -26 0 JN49ik 1 W1VD FN31ls 6099 295 [...] Content analysis details: (-2.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 69d86b33142413363dd56bd312139bf4 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Experimental software for WSPR-8 and -32 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090702090201090800070004" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40cd505e56ed453c X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090702090201090800070004 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jay, Thank you once again! Congrats to your equipment! Timestamp Call MHz SNR Drift Grid Pwr Reporter RGrid km az 2012-09-23 00:08 DK7FC 0.136164 -27 0 JN49ik 1 W1VD FN31ls 6099 295 2012-09-22 23:48 DK7FC 0.136223 -26 0 JN49ik 1 W1VD FN31ls 6099 295 How do you estimate the conds today? From your experience, is the SNR improvement of WSPR-8 significantly? Hard to estimate if it is really 6 dB... Will see how things proceed in the night. 8 minutes is still a good time to detect changes in propagation.. 73, Stefan/DK7FC --------------090702090201090800070004 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de id q8N0OXk6016409 Jay,

Thank you once again! Congrats to your equipment!

Timestamp Call MHz SNR Drift Grid Pwr Reporter RGrid km az
=C2=A02012-09-23 00:08=C2=A0 =C2=A0DK7FC=C2=A0 =C2=A00.136164=C2=A0 =C2=A0-27=C2=A0 =C2=A00=C2=A0 =C2=A0JN49ik=C2=A0 =C2=A01=C2=A0 =C2=A0W1VD=C2=A0 =C2=A0FN31ls=C2=A0 =C2=A06099=C2=A0 =C2=A0295=C2=A0
=C2=A02012-09-22 23:48=C2=A0 =C2=A0DK7FC=C2=A0 =C2=A00.136223=C2=A0 =C2=A0-26=C2=A0 =C2=A00=C2=A0 =C2=A0JN49ik=C2=A0 =C2=A01=C2=A0 =C2=A0W1VD=C2=A0 =C2=A0FN31ls=C2=A0 =C2=A06099=C2=A0 =C2=A0295=C2=A0

How do you estimate the conds today? From your experience, is the SNR improvement of WSPR-8 significantly? Hard to estimate if it is really 6 dB...
Will see how things proceed in the night.
8 minutes is still a good time to detect changes in propagation..

73, Stefan/DK7FC
--------------090702090201090800070004--