Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mk02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 4B0FE3800008F; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 14:19:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TFUHT-00026b-7n for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 19:18:19 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TFUHS-00026S-MP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 19:18:18 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TFUHQ-0007cE-SJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 19:18:17 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q8MIIFVn028756 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 20:18:15 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q8MIIFRm019221 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 20:18:15 +0200 Message-ID: <505E001A.4090301@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 20:14:50 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <41E179E8BC3D497AB344D966959A61C6@White> <505D0DB5.4080108@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <386BA5055A494FEC9164314A593DCB8D@White> <000901cd98a8$7cd20a00$76761e00$@com> <505DB5C3.2040901@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <972D0C66C74A41968A7D806701F5EDD6@AGB> In-Reply-To: <972D0C66C74A41968A7D806701F5EDD6@AGB> X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I'll give it a try Graham. The problem may be to find monitoring stations in a short range... 73, Stefan Am 22.09.2012 17:20, schrieb Graham: > And of course there is a 240 SDR data mode , all ready > for 8Khz tested to -50 dB as bench mark : ) > > *From:* Stefan Schäfer > *Sent:* Saturday, September 22, 2012 1:57 PM > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Subject:* Re: LF: Experimental software for WSPR-8 and -32 > > Hi all, > > Hmmm, theoretically we can generate every WSPR speed now. Markus, > should we try a WSPR-256 on VLF/ 8970 Hz? :-) I still have the big > coil in the cellar and the band looks fine :-) > Remember the "old" times... > http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber.html > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC [...] Content analysis details: (-1.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: ebba021850e0a5d4120636e52401e975 Subject: Re: LF: Experimental software for WSPR-8 and -32 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090508070707080500010801" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d6186505e011c653f X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090508070707080500010801 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id q8MIIFVn028756 I'll give it a try Graham. The problem may be to find monitoring=20 stations in a short range... 73, Stefan Am 22.09.2012 17:20, schrieb Graham: > And of course there is a 240 SDR data mode , all ready =20 > for 8Khz tested to -50 dB as bench mark : ) > > *From:* Stefan Sch=E4fer > *Sent:* Saturday, September 22, 2012 1:57 PM > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Subject:* Re: LF: Experimental software for WSPR-8 and -32 > > Hi all, > > Hmmm, theoretically we can generate every WSPR speed now. Markus,=20 > should we try a WSPR-256 on VLF/ 8970 Hz? :-) I still have the big=20 > coil in the cellar and the band looks fine :-) > Remember the "old" times...=20 > http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber.html > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC --------------090508070707080500010801 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I'll give it a try Graham. The problem may be to find monitoring stations in a short range...

73, Stefan

Am 22.09.2012 17:20, schrieb Graham:
And of course  there  is a   240  SDR  data    mode  , all  ready  for  8Khz  tested  to  -50 dB  as bench mark   : )

Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 1:57 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Experimental software for WSPR-8 and -32

Hi all,

Hmmm, theoretically we can generate every WSPR speed now. Markus, should we try a WSPR-256 on VLF/ 8970 Hz? :-) I still have the big coil in the cellar and the band looks fine :-)
Remember the "old" times... http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber.html

73, Stefan/DK7FC
--------------090508070707080500010801--