Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dl03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 0917C38000082; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 05:01:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TEccn-0000jq-HR for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 10:00:45 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TEccn-0000jh-3n for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 10:00:45 +0100 Received: from out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.237]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TEccl-00058W-5A for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 10:00:44 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApYBAGzaWlBOlnD5/2dsb2JhbAANOIYKhV+tcoZgAQEBAQIBI1sLCwQBBA8JFgsCAgkDAgECAUUQAwgBAYd5pl9ukmuLHBuDB4INgRIDlWSTCA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,453,1344207600"; d="scan'208,217";a="404240160" Received: from host-78-150-112-249.as13285.net (HELO [192.168.2.2]) ([78.150.112.249]) by out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 20 Sep 2012 10:00:39 +0100 Message-ID: <505ADB36.3090906@psk31.plus.com> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 10:00:38 +0100 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <26496.242258fa.3d8a3fd4@aol.com> <5058F07B.70907@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <73498DBA-E576-4F56-82BD-D049D3DFFD89@gmail.com> <5059BB53.10602@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <000601cd9665$2d4a74d0$6d01a8c0@DELL4> <505A51EF.8060502@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <505A5B6D.3010001@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <505A5C71.5070908@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <505A5C71.5070908@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Stephan On 20/09/2012 00:59, Stefan Schäfer wrote: > Impressing. If this mode contains the call + locator (JN49)+ power > information and all this is transferred within 2 minutes... then this > is even faster than DFCW-3. What do you mean *if* ? it has been doing just that perfectly for me since 11th March 2008 when it was called MEPT JT. :-) [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.237 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 32d4aaaf019758ff5a0d8e92eec683e6 Subject: Re: LF: WSPR-2 results Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000403030403010802020108" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4ad1505adb655112 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000403030403010802020108 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Stephan On 20/09/2012 00:59, Stefan Schäfer wrote: > Impressing. If this mode contains the call + locator (JN49)+ power > information and all this is transferred within 2 minutes... then this > is even faster than DFCW-3. What do you mean *if* ? it has been doing just that perfectly for me since 11th March 2008 when it was called MEPT JT. :-) > slower WSPR version for LF, in a few months (hopefully). > We must get that WSPR-32 mode ready. I cant help thinking that if it was anything to do with Jose Alberto Nieto Ros the 32 minute version would be ready next morning. I look forward to trying it on air if / when it does materialise. 73 Eddie G3ZJO --------------000403030403010802020108 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hi Stephan

On 20/09/2012 00:59, Stefan Schäfer wrote:
Impressing. If this mode contains the call + locator (JN49)+ power information and all this is transferred within 2 minutes... then this is even faster than DFCW-3.
What do you mean if ? it has been doing just that perfectly for me since 11th March 2008 when it was called MEPT JT. :-)

slower WSPR version for LF, in a few months (hopefully).
We must get that WSPR-32 mode ready.

I cant help thinking that if it was anything to do with Jose Alberto Nieto Ros the 32 minute version would be ready next morning.
I look forward to trying it on air if / when it does materialise.

73
 Eddie G3ZJO

--------------000403030403010802020108--