Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-me01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id C419E38000094; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 18:23:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TE6BJ-0002RY-AO for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 23:22:13 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TE6BI-0002RP-T9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 23:22:12 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TE6BG-0005Z0-Kq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 23:22:11 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q8IMM7ME031356 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 00:22:08 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q8IMM7f4016701 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 00:22:07 +0200 Message-ID: <5058F346.3000706@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 00:18:46 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?U3RlZmFuIFNjaMOkZmVy?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <2456f.59796ccc.3d8a3418@aol.com> <5058E1CA.3090201@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <17D145F3-B94B-4939-8CEC-3A8395E686B1@gmail.com> <5058E8D4.9040105@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <007301cd95e8$52b223d0$0201a8c0@marco09cqcdi12> In-Reply-To: <007301cd95e8$52b223d0$0201a8c0@marco09cqcdi12> X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Marco, Oops, does that mean my mains hum sideband rejection is only 25 dB? No, i measured 35 dB here. And it will become much better soon because i will build a new type of power supply soon... Thanks for the reportS ;-) [...] Content analysis details: (-1.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 896f9ee4f10c5db37812c155e804756d Subject: Re: LF: WSPR tests by DK7FC Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020403000509060803030704" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60895058f4526046 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020403000509060803030704 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Marco, Oops, does that mean my mains hum sideband rejection is only 25 dB? No, i measured 35 dB here. And it will become much better soon because i will build a new type of power supply soon... Thanks for the reportS ;-) 73, Stefan Am 18.09.2012 23:55, schrieb Marco Cadeddu: > Hi Stefan, > it's quite incredible but if you have look on the spotdatabase you wil > see my uploaded report: at 21.46 UTC you are -3dB on your QRG (137449) > and decoded with -28dB on a (HUM carrier) on 137550! > Marco, IK1HSS > --------------020403000509060803030704 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id q8IMM7ME031356 Hi Marco,

Oops, does that mean my mains hum sideband rejection is only 25 dB? No, i measured 35 dB here. And it will become much better soon because i will build a new type of power supply soon...

Thanks for the reportS ;-)

73, Stefan

Am 18.09.2012 23:55, schrieb Marco Cadeddu:
Hi Stefan,
=C2=A0
it's quite incredible but if you have look on the spotdatabase you wil see my uploaded report: at 21.46 UTC you are -3dB on your QRG (137449) and decoded with -28dB on a (HUM carrier) on 137550!
=C2=A0
Marco, IK1HSS

--------------020403000509060803030704--